"The book is a film that takes place in the mind of the reader." ~ Paulo Coelho
Showing posts with label Mystery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mystery. Show all posts

Sunday, May 19, 2024

Inklings // May 2024

Hello, friends!

It's a new month, so it's a new Inklings! This monthly link-up is hosted by the lovely lady of Anorien herself, Heidi! I was going to wait until closer to the end of the month to post, but I couldn't get this Inklings prompt off my mind, so why wait?

How it works:

    1. At any time during the month, on your own blog post a scene from a book or film that matches the prompt, including a link back to the original post in your post.

    2. Leave a link to your post in the comments section of the monthly post and she'll post all your links with the next prompt.

Click HERE to see all of my past entries, and click HERE to see all of the entries for this month! That second link is where she gave the following prompt:


May 2024: A scene with a pearl necklace in book or film


Before we get into it, I want to relay a recent discovery. My older sister knits a lot and there are a few different stitches with different names. This whole time (since she was 9 or 10), I thought it was knit and pearl. Apparently it's knit and purl. So no knitting in this post.

I'm choosing a passage from the book Death on the Nile by Agatha Christie. 

I'm not the only person to choose an Agatha Christie inspired scene because Autumn Grace used a scene from the TV show Poirot. What can I say, mysteries and pearls go so well together.

Because of that, I don't want to tell you what happens in the mystery. This is from the first chapter, so no spoilers, but believe me, these pearls show up again and again.


"Joanna picked up a string of pearls from the dressing table.

'I suppose these are real, aren't they, Linnet?'

'Of course.'

'I know it's "of course" to you, my sweet, but it wouldn't be to most people. Heavily cultured or even Woolworth! Darling, they really are incredible, so exquisitely matched. They must be worth the most fabulous sum!'

'Rather vulgar, you think?'

'No, not at all---just pure beauty. What are they worth?'

'About fifty thousand.'

'What a lovely lot of money! Aren't you afraid of having them stolen?'

'No, I always wear them---and anyway they're insured.'

'Let me wear them till dinnertime, will you, darling? It would give me such a thrill.'

Linnet laughed.

'Of course, if you like.'

'You know, Linnet, I really do any you. You've simply got everything. Here you are at twenty, your own mistress, with any amount of money, looks, superb health. You've even got brains!...'"


This was my first Christie mystery (whoa, that rhymes) because I'd decided I was going to write a mystery myself because I was such a Nancy Drew fan. I'd proudly announced that it was going to be on a boat and my mom told me I should read Death on the Nile for "research". I LOVED IT. And in fact, I could never really go back to Nancy Drew because this was so complicated! I still haven't read all that many Agatha Christie books, but I consider her one of my favorite authors and the mystery genre is a comfort genre for sure.

Usually on this blog for Inklings I talk about movie scenes. I really enjoy both film versions of Death on the Nile (1978 and 2022), but neither of them incorporate pearls in the same genius way! 1987 has a shortened version, and 2022 turns the pearls into jewels and again, shortens what really happens. (Don't get me wrong, what they did instead BROKE ME and I love it and hate it at the same time). So the book it is! I reread this before watching either of those movies (in 2020) and had completely misinterpreted somethings the first time. But not how marvelously complicated it is.

Thanks to Heidi for hosting! Make sure you check out all the other entries HERE.

Is there a book that changed how you look at a genre? Do pearls seem like too much of a liability for you? Does anyone else know any of the other scenes with pearls in this book? What do you guys think of the film versions? Thank you for reading! 


Chloe the MovieCritic

Friday, February 25, 2022

The We Love Detectives Week Tag!

Who's ready to party?

What's this party about? I'm not telling you. Because it's a mystery. Which, in fact, just revealed what it is. Today is the last day of Hamlette's We Love Detectives Week! Each year around Valentine's Day she hosts a week long celebration talking about why we love a certain part of stories. Whether it is an author, genre, or type of character!


This year's focus is detectives, which makes me happy beyond reason. Mystery books were the first genre that I was able to tell apart from others. I LOVED them and told everyone that fact. I wanted to be a detective when I grew up. In fact, my 8th birthday was themed "spy" (because I couldn't tell the difference between spies and detectives, but I was going for detective and my mom knew that). I received two magnifying glasses. One that was pocket sized and I carried it around with me all that summer in a little bag (I lost it once and my mom got me a replacement which was the sweetest thing ever!).

Stories were what influenced me about this. One of the first books I bought for myself was a mystery (it was a rip off of the Nancy Drew series that is set in the modern times, but I loved it all the same. Though I was betrayed when I learned it wasn't the "real" Nancy Drew. But what really is "real" when it comes to Nancy?). I scoured my library for mysteries, and after I was done reading the approx. 15 Nancy Drew books they owned (it's a small library, okay?) I went on to read some REALLY obscure mysteries. Good times. Also, one of my first books I started writing was a mystery. I made it four chapters in (my first time writing on a computer!), drew a picture of my detective (which is rare for me to do! If I start drawing that means I'm really into something), and planned out at least seven books in the series. Maybe one day I will return to it... Even to this date, I've only finished writing two books (I have...drafts for others), and one of them is a mystery (a poor one at that! It needs revisions). When life doesn't make sense I need someone to solve a slice of it for me, then I can plunge back into my own adventures.

That is my ode to mysteries. But that is not all that I'm here for. Hamlette created a tag for the occasion, so I am filling it out here!

For this tag I said I could only use a book or movie once, but I couldn't help myself when it came to one book or movie per question. There are too many to only talk about ten!


Questions: What's your favorite mystery with...

1. ...a historical setting?

I don't know if it is my favorite because of it's setting, but I want to talk about it all the same, because it doesn't fit anywhere else (because, yes, I am answering the first question last.). The Great Mouse Detective (1986)! This movie t e r r i f i e d me when I was little (Fidget. *shudders* Ratigan. *full on chills*) but at the same time my sisters and I loved it and would watch it a lot. Yes, it is an animated movie with animals as the main characters, but it is fully in a historical setting. Just look at what Basil of Baker Street is wearing! And it involves a historical figure, kind of.



2. ...a modern setting?

Knives Out (2019). It is brilliant in more ways than I can count. Most of the mysteries I know of are set in older settings, so this was so fun to see something set in modern times. And on top of all of that, the aesthetic is *chef's kiss*. (Did you guys here that they're working on a sequel??)



3. ...a lone detective?


Hercule Poirot. Technically he usually has a friend to help him out and explain things too, but it is not dependent on a certain person and changes it up every few books. So, we can call him "lone". I love him in the books (though I have sadly only read 5 or 6) as well as David Suchet's and Kenneth Branagh's portrayals (Death on the Nile came out! Ack! I'm waiting to watch it with my sisters, but I am PUMPED.)



4. ...a pair of sleuths?

Ah, this version! I love it too much. So much that I have watched it two days in a row and enjoyed every second both times.

It is cliche to say this, but Sherlock Holmes and John Watson. Some people forget that they are a duo, but they are both so important. I have only found one version where I like Sherlock Holmes without a Watson to accompany him (because there is a different detective there, too...named Enola. But you guys are probably getting tired of me talking about that movie...).

And then you have these two. Who I started out annoyed with but love them so much by the fourth season.


5. ...a professional/police detective?

TinTin! That's all there needs to be said.



6. ...an amateur detective?

I already mentioned Nancy Drew a lot in my ode to mysteries, but those were the books. Not the 2007 movie. In this movie Nancy is actually prohibited by her dad to solve mysteries. And she really wants to do what he says, but they come to her despite her best attempts. She never wants payment, she just wants to help people.

Or the Scooby Doo gang! I could watch these cartoons for hours (and have...). Those meddling kids always solve everything and I love them.



7. ...a young sleuth?

Though I've only read 3 of the books (out of 21. I'm a 7th of the way through!), my current favorite is Sammy Keyes from the Sammy Keyes books by Wendelin Van Draanen. Yes, I have deep nostalgia for Nancy Drew, but lately anytime I read one of those books I'm just cringing and making fun of it the whole time. It was perfect for me at a certain age! Whereas with Sammy Keyes, I still enjoy them at this age because there is more depth to the characters. I mean, Sammy is getting in trouble all the time and has so many mysteries up her sleeve. I think if I had read Sammy Keyes when I was younger I would have made more of an effort to read them all. Don't get me wrong, I am enjoying these books SO much, but more as a treat from time to time than I need to breathe in these books. You know what I mean?


I have a hilarious story about another young sleuth. Flavia de Luce is a 12 year old British detective-chemist genius from the 50s in books by Alan Bradley. While I didn't adore the only book I've read as it fell into a mystery trope that I LOATHE (and have only seen done correctly ONCE. Which, actually, is on this list somewhere...any guesses?), I saw a lot of potential and have been meaning to get back to the series. (I tried a few months ago by checking out an audiobook, but I hated it because the narrator said every single name differently than I had). 

ANYWAY. Back to the story. I first heard about these books when my librarian read the first one. She recommended it to me because she said there were three sisters and they reminded her of my sisters and I. That intrigued me enough to read it. As soon as I met 'Philia, Daph', and Flav' I started cracking up with laughter. I guess our librarian thinks of my older sister as stuck up and obsessed with her appearance, she thinks of me as rude and obsessed with books and the piano (only partly true), and she thinks of my younger sister as the genius of our century (the one correct element). And that we are all trying to kill each other all the time? I have never seen sisters more far apart than my sisters and I, but I guess that is a mystery to everyone else...



8. ...an aging detective?

I feel like I've seen a brilliant aging detective, but my mind is blanking. I cannot think of one! Man, I guess all I read about is young whippersnappers.

9. ...a cozy feel?


My grandma has a few mystery books and when I got old enough to read them I was so excited, and just thinking about them gives me the coziest feeling. Both The Secret of the Old Post Box - by Dorothy Sterling and The Pink Motel - by Carol Ryrie Brink. Though not complex (in fact, the mystery is quite obvious), The Pink Motel is so cute that I've read it more than once (which is rare for me).

And if I just want to feel cozy in the Old West, I love reading Jedidiah Jones solve what is going on in  Dancing and Doughnuts - by Rachel Kovaciny. Our own dear host of this blogathon!


10. ...a shocking reveal?

...is it a spoiler to tell someone that a book or movie was surprising? I don't know. Well, it isn't for my sister because she goes into every book and movie expecting 100% what is going to happen so when it doesn't she's surprised. As for me, I go in without a thought so everything is surprising...


The Illusionist (2006)
keeps me on my toes. The pace of this movie is INSANE as things are always happening or are deathly still. There is no in between. This is one of my favorite movies because (some content aside) it is one of the most ingenious things I've ever seen and my mind is blown every time I watch it. Which is quite a few times.




Enough about me. Check out the other entries HERE! This week had been a blast and has made me what to seek out some mysteries (fictional, not in my life. I don't need more of those). I have my eye on either Sammy Keyes or Flavia de Luce now...

A huge thank you to Hamlette for hosting this! Thank you also to all of you for reading! What do you think of my answers? Have any of you seen or read any of these? I'm especially wondering about Nancy Drew (2007) and The Illusionist (2006)...

Until next time, friends! 

Chloe the MovieCritic

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

Help Wanted: What Are These Movies?

Hello, friends!

I am returning briefly to make sure that this blog stays alive against all odds, as it will probably be awhile before I do something again. The previous two years in November I did NaNoWriMo and was very satisfied that at the same time I was able to keep this blog running, with nine posts both times. Well, this year I want to try NaNo again, but with my higher work load this blog might be neglected (more than it already is? I don't know if that's possible).

You probably came here looking at the post title and wondering what I want. I was inspired a few months ago by Elizabeth at Autumn Ink with her post Does Anyone Know This Movie or Did I Make It Up?. In that post she talked about a movie she had seen part of once and was curious about seeing the rest. Problem: she had no idea what it was.

My mind and memory has been wiped.

This reminded me of all the movies I have seen in my life that I really enjoyed yet have no idea what they were. The curse of cable TV. Now I'm spoiled it being able to look at what it is called, or watch things because I want to, not hope to find something good by chance. Why not do what Elizabeth did and take this to a bigger audience? That's what I'm here to do today!

Prepare yourselves: This is a very long list. VERY long.

First, you should know that I'm bad at explaining things. In the past I have had times where I've had success at finding these movies, and other times where I've just made the situation more confusing.


1st example: (Where I show how bad I am at explaining things)
I'd gotten up early once because I couldn't sleep, so my dad and I started watching a movie, and I really loved it. The next day I eagerly explained it to my mom.
Me: "There was this priest and this other guy who were in prison, and the other guy got out and found a lot of money. He then went to this new house and I was there! He had parties and was trying to find people. Then there was this kid who almost got his finger cut off. Then fighting and how people weren't saints and...*trails off into spoilers*"
My dad walks in.
My mom: "What movie were you watching with MC last night?"

......

...any guesses?...

......


......

My dad: "The Count of Monte Cristo."
My mom: "Oh! That makes more sense. But what do you mean, MC, that "you were there"?"
Me: "Dad said so."
My mom looks inquisitively at my dad.
My dad: "The filmed part of it at Powerscourt in Ireland and I told MC how I carried her all over there."

See it in the background there?

I know, I sound like Donald in National Velvet (1944) arguing about how the story goes with Mi Taylor as "I was there!" 
Everyone else: "No you weren't. You were a star." 
Donald: "I was not a star! I was there!"
At least I'm not always insisting that "I was sick all night."




2nd example:
Long, long, long ago in a galaxy far far away I had seen this movie and I really loved it (surprise surprise, you will see that this is a common factor. That's why I still remember them.)

It was about a woman and her daughter who lived a luxurious life on top of a rock. The daughter had never seen any of the world. One day two things happened, the first was where an old guy got up there by falling from the sky. Later, a young guy climbed up the rock based on a challenge and then fell in love with the girl. Happily ever after?

In 2018, on January 4th (oddly specific, but I know because I wrote it down) I was doing things in the same room that my dad was watching a movie. It had W. C. Fields and I thought it was ridiculous. I wasn't paying attention, but when I stood up to go I saw people from the movie I had always known! I screamed and made my dad tell me what this was.

Never Give A Sucker an Even Break (1941).


Weird title, I know. The part that I had remembered was a very small section. The premise was even stranger than I thought it was. Nevertheless, my dad and I quote other parts of the movie all the time now:
'"Don't you want to grow up and be smart?"
"I don't want to be smart. I want to be like you."'



3rd example:
I had been asleep in our living room and woke up to my dad watching a movie. I was listening to it for awhile without opening my eyes and because a character was Juli thought it was an American Girl movie. I was very confused. Finally I opened my eyes and was watching, too. I absolutely loved it.

It was about a girl and a tree. It switched perspectives and was also about a boy who hated eggs. Yet Juli kept giving him eggs. Juli liked this boy and he was always trying to run away from her, but then things started to change...


Then my dad realized that I was watching, too, and was embarrassed that I had caught him. And switched to a different channel. Then feigned having no idea what I was talking about when I tried to convince him to turn back. I thought I would add it to the movies I would never see. Woe is me. 


I'm not sure how it happened EXACTLY, but here's one version. At that exact time I had been reading Sammy Keyes and the Hotel Thief - by Wendelin Van Draanen. I had looked her up (as you do when books are awesome) and found that she had written many. About a week later I read Olivia's post about Top Ten Book Couples and began screaming (another common factor of these reveals). There was a picture of Bryce and Juli!!! And she said it was from something called Flipped?? I looked it up and was greeted by one of Wendelin Van Draanen's books. So, I would've found it eventually, but I'm gratified that it was only a week of agony.




Oh, and I remember the day that I figured out Ocean's 11 (1960) was the awesome robbery movie. I had more of a clue there because I knew Frank Sinatra was in it.


Wow, that could be a post on it's own. Sorry. There's more.
Tl;dr: I am bad at explaining things, but extremely lucky. Maybe you guys can help me figure out what these movies are? I'm going to be saying everything I remember about it, so there might be spoilers. But if you don't know what it is then doesn't it really count, right?


1st movie I need help on:

This movie had something I love: outlaws. It was black and white. For awhile I thought it was The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938), but that, of course, is in brilliant technicolor. It was about outlaws who were against an evil reign, and the key to all of this was some jewels. The jewelry had been placed the care of a noble lady who was traveling. The leader of the outlaws was able to meet her and convince her to join their side (twue wove) and give them the jewels. She did and they all escaped together after there had been resistance and the shooting of arrows. Once safe, the outlaws had a bonfire in the forest, all rejoicing. Everything was going well until the leader collapsed. He had been hurt but hadn't let anyone know! The ending maybe ends with a castle burning? I remember the striking visual effects.



2nd movie I need help on:

I am pretty sure that this had Robin Williams in it. It was about these bad guys who kidnapped a guy and and his daughter. I think the guy was an inventor, or had a job that was worth ransoming. Earlier in the movie we had seen these boys who were either the girl's friends or bullies. They had made fun of her for her lipgloss that was either 1. a particular color, like orange or 2. scented? Anyway, these kidnappers are taking the man and his daughter somewhere so they are on the road. They take a break at a rest stop quickly, and the girl draws with her lipstick on the mirror. Later, those same friends/bullies find it and recognize that she was there and know where to find her?



3rd movie I need help on:

This one I think had a title with something to do with a club? It was a mystery of some kind? Maybe, the Boathouse Club? It was about kids who got together to help others or solve mysteries. A little girl was in a bad situation with her stepmother and her stepmother's boyfriend? I think she was locked in the house and not allowed to go out. She started writing a note to the club, but misspelled something so she started again. This time she finished it up, and taking a balloon (it had been her birthday?) she tied it to the balloon and sent it out the window. The stepmother noticed the balloon was missing and the little girl claimed she had flushed it down the toilet. The stepmother finds the first abandoned note...





Now you have had a peak inside my mind. I have others, but I think this is enough for now. I'll see how well this works out before I get my hopes up.

Maybe it's too late. I really want to know what these stories are.

So, tell me: does anyone know what in the world these movies are? Are my explanations confusing? Do you need more information? Does anyone know the movies I talked about in my examples?

Please! Tell me all your theories no matter how far off they seem!

I also want to thank you all for your comments! Right now I only have time to write new posts or reply, so I'm writing new posts, but I will get around to replying! The comments always make my day! I'm working on a special project for all of you that I am really excited about. I hope you like it, too!

Until then, my friends!

Chloe the MovieCritic

Sunday, July 11, 2021

Book vs. TV Show Review: A Series of Unfortunate Events: The Reptile Room

Hello, readers!

It is time to continue reviewing a tale of misery and woe! Lemony Snicketʼs series of unfortunate events is going to go on for many more reviews. Confused at what Iʼm talking about? Check out my review for the first book and first episodes of the series, The Bad Beginning.

Because this is such a big series, Iʼm going to get more and more vague when it comes to the descriptions for each book/episode. In whatever format you chose, this is a fun series and I want you to enjoy it as it comes without knowing what happens!

My guarantee: On ALL of my reviews there are NO spoilers unless I give you warning. All of these reviews are spoiler free for your enjoyment!



A Series of Unfortunate Events: The Reptile Room - by Lemony Snicket:
The Baudelaires are ready for a new chapter in their life, but they are tentative when they are going to be living with another relative that they have never heard of. Could it be as bad as last time? Uncle Monty seems really nice and treats the children to cake, movies, and soon a trip! His profession as a herpetologist is strange at first, but Violet, Klaus, and Sunny can get used to it. When Uncle Montyʼs new assistant, Stephano, arrives, the quiet world the children were starting to build again shatters. What kind of danger lies in wait in the Reptile Room?
ʻ“Dewk!” Sunny shrieked in a generic cry of frustration and pounded her little fist on the floor. The word “generic” here means when one is unable to think of anything else to say, and Sunny was not alone in this. Violet and Klaus were, of course, too old to say things like, “dewk”, but they wished they werenʼt.ʼ
Genres: Fiction, Middle Grade Fiction, Mystery.
Characters: 8. The characters have most certainly grown on me with each time I read it. 
My favorites:
Violet: She is so resourceful! I love how she is respectful and optimistic and knows when the time is to act.
ʻ“Nice girls shouldnʼt know how to do those kinds of things.”
“My sister is a nice girl and can do many things.”ʼ
Klaus: If you read my last review you know that I sometimes have a hard time liking Klaus because he gets on my nerves. It was all because of something that I didnʼt understand: whenever someone says a fancy word they try to explain what it means and Klaus, the know-it-all, says he already knows. When I was little I thought it was the most infuriating thing! Well, this book explains it:
ʻOccasionally, people thought that because they were orphans they were also dim- witted.ʼ
Klaus reads a ton of books and of course he knows lots of words so I understand how he can get frustrated when people are constantly thinking that he doesnʼt know anything, especially when half the time they incorrectly define the words.
 ʻKlaus sighed. He felt sometimes as if he had spent half his life explaining things to Mr. Poe.ʼ
Sunny: Poor Sunny goes through a lot in this book and I just want to cuddle her.
Uncle Monty: I never realized it, but when it comes to books and movies I get VERY suspicious. And because of that I tend to dislike characters when it isnʼt their fault. I didnʼt trust Monty for the longest time when I first read this book. Poor guy! Now I like him even in his oblivion.
ʻ“How many time must I remind you, itʼs not polite to interrupt!” Uncle Monty interrupted.ʼ
Words/Writing style: 7. This rating is bumped down because there are some poorly used words. Lemony Snicket tells us that people sometime yell out names when they are surprised or scared, but I donʼt approve. We didnʼt need to hear it Mr. Poe, so I donʼt appreciate it.
There is one other bad word, but it is pointed out:
ʻIt is, as you know, very, very, rude and usually unnecessary to use profanity...ʼ
Exactly! I wouldnʼt want to copy anything that the person who said it does, but I still donʼt approve. Even when Lemony Snicket made me laugh.
Besides that, the writing style continues to be so much fun. All of the rule breaking and straightening out are a hoot. My favorite is when the word “ever” is used over 200 times. Just read the book and youʼll find out what that means.
World building/Setting: 8. When I first listened to the whole series this book struck me as having one of the most unique settings. While I now appreciate how each of the books have a different creative setting, I still really like this one. Imagine starting a peaceful life on “Lousy Lane”!
Quotability: 9. Lemony Snicketʼs writing sticks with you and is worth of repeating! I think my sister and I both think of this book whenever we think of eavesdropping and we think of some lines about it.
Content: 8. There are some violent threats and fear that goes with it. There is a death and the after affects are vividly described. All of this though is shown as bad!
I like how Lemony Snicket makes fun of things that are usually thought of as dangerous, as shown in this line:
“There is a pair of snakes whoʼve learned to drive a car so recklessly that they would run you over in the street and never stop to apologize.”
Notes: My sister and I feel like Lemony Snicket is well versed in Monty Python, and took some inspiration from that. Does anyone else see that? Doesn't just the name say a lot?
Originality: 9. I donʼt think Iʼve ever read another book that feature snake in this way! The ending is particularly complex which is something that pleases me.
Good For: This is such a hard thing to pin down because it really depends on the person! Either you will love the writing and root for the children to come out on top in all of their woe, or you will find the misery too disturbing. Do you like droll writing that is hilarious in the midst of trouble while having poignagt moments? This might be for you! 
Age Range: The range this spans is quite large. Itʼs written as Middle Grade Fiction so kids can look up to the Baudelaires who carry on in spite of troubles, and are relatable as Violet and Klaus are fourteen and twelve. On the flip side my sister and I are two adults who are WAY too into these books.
Overall Score: 8.
Worth reading?: Certainly! The themes that are explored in here hit quite deep, in particular, regret. We all wish that we could correct something in our lives by doing something different, but we canʼt. This book made me think about it a lot and appreciate that weʼll have more choices and chances to do right in the future.
ʻOne of the most difficult things to think about in life is ones regrets. Something will happen to you and would will do the wrong thing and for years afterward you will wish you had done something different. For instance, sometimes when Iʼm walking along the seashore or visiting the grave of a friend, I will remember a day a long time ago when I didnʼt bring a flashlight with me to a place where I shouldʼve brought a flashlight and the results were disastrous. “Why didnʼt I bring a flashlight?” I think to myself even though it is too late to do anything about it, “I shouldʼve brought a flashlight.”ʼ
Will I read again?: Iʼm not afraid of a lot of things, but one thing that I just canʼt stand is snakes. When I first read this book I was so relieved when it was over and never wanted to read it again. But you know what? I donʼt mind any more. This book is a little dry in places but still important to the series and I will read it many more times in my life Iʼm sure.
'Klaus sighed, and opened a book, and as at so many other times when the middle Baudelaire child did not want to think about his circumstances, he began to read.' 
Audiobook: Length: approx. 191 minutes.
I used to abhor it, but now my favorite part of this audiobook is the song “In the Reptile Room”. It is so horridly funny I canʼt even explain it. I highly recommend reading it this way, though Iʼm not fond of Tim Curryʼs narration of Monty. Besides that the narration is perfect!
Bonus thoughts:
This time around the ending struck a chord with me. It is soft in the middle of a hard world and I might be obsessed with it now. The accompanying music from the audiobook nearly made me cry.



VS.



A Series of Unfortunate Events: Season 1, Episodes 3 & 4: The Reptile Room Parts 1 & 2 (2017):
Based on:
A Series of Unfortunate Events: The Reptile Room - by Lemony Snicket 
“Itʼs a brand new episode in your lives, Baudalaires!” 
Lousy Lane seems like an unfortunate place for the Baudelairesʼs to start their new lives, but they donʼt have a choice, as it is up to Mr. Poe. Despite their fears, Uncle Monty seems to be a good guardian. He is friendly and teaches them about reptiles as he is a herpetologist. Violet, Klaus, and Sunny each get to do what they like and are taken care of. But Lemony Snicket informs us that this happiness wonʼt last. What with a new assistant, secret messages, movies, and snakes, someone is bound to get hurt...
“Iʼm giving you the verified film discount.”
Genres:
Comedy, Drama, Family, Mystery. 
Length: Episode 3: approx. 48 minutes. Episode 4: approx. 43 minutes. Total time: 91 minutes.
Script: 7. It took out one bad word that was in the book, but there is an instance where one person screams some names which annoys me. Not cool, dude.
“Iʼm terribly sorry if I was rude to him, children, but frankly, that man ruffles my scales.” 
Crew:
Directed by:
Mark Palansky. Produced by: Daniel Handler, Neil Patrick Harris, Emily Fox, & Barry Sonnenfeld. Written by: Daniel Handler, Emily Fox, & Joe Tracz.
Starring:
Patrick Warburton as Lemony Snicket.
Malina Weissman as Violet Baudelaire.
Louis Hynes as Klaus Baudelaire.
Presley Smith as Sunny Baudelaire.
Aasif Mandvi as Uncle Monty.
K. Todd Freeman as Arthur Poe.
Neil Patrick Harris as Stephano.
Matthew Walker as the Ticket Seller.
Also featuring: Usman Ally, Matty Cardarople, John DeSantis, Jacqueline Robbins, Joyce Robbins, Cobie Smulders, Will Arnett, Sara Canning, & Luke Camilleri.
Costumes: 9. I still don't know what time period this is supposed to be, but the costumes are so well designed! There is one person who looks so different that I would never have recognized him if it hadn't been pointed out to me. Yes, I am as bad as all of the adults. Once I noticed I can see it, but that initial look wasn't obvious to me.
Cinematography:
10. I wouldn't have noticed this until my sister pointed it out, but now I am shocked by how good it is: when the children meet Monty the dialogue and cinematography mirror that of when they met Count Olaf in the first episode. It is a brilliantly played move! It shows how the same words and actions can have the opposite meanings and intents when said in a different way. The set design for Monty's house is also fabulous and I now want to live there. The CGI for animals isn't the best as it looks fake, but I'm so impressed that I'm not going to take off a point for that.
Cinematography by:
 Bernard Couture.
Music: 9. The theme song is still as splendid as always. For each book the verse in the middle is changed to fit the story and the lyrics are so clever with their rhymes. I also noticed the score in the background more than in the first episode which almost made me cry at one point, but that was just me being overly emotional.
Music by: James Newton Howard & Sven Faulconer.
Notes: All of the references had my sister and I really excited! There was one Easter egg that appeared in the background while Lemony Snicket was talking and we couldn't stop screaming because it confirms something later in the series that is never talked about directly. It also subtly incorporates things that will be used later on which pleases me tremendously. I am now interested in seeing the movie The Dawn Patrol (1938) which is said to be Violet's favorite movie! Lemony Snicket's other series, All the Wrong Questions, is also mentioned!
ʻ“Howʼd he find us?”
“Thatʼs the wrong question. What do we do?”ʼ
Quotability: 10. The quotes are so repeatable! Even words that aren't said but just appear teach me things! Even Em (who seems to know every word) had to look up what vitiated means.
“Life is a conundrum of esoterica.”
My sister claims that Klaus defined "esoterica" incorrectly. His description better fits ephemera, as he mentions documents instead just generic facts. Em is very proud to have corrected the bookworm, but I'm still dubious. What do you guys think?
Content: 8. There are threats, kidnapping, death, and some scary things if you don't like snakes. Or just make you sad. It did both for me.
Originality: 10. Of the whole TV show, these are probably the episodes that differ the most from the books, but I don't mind at all because I absolutely love it! It takes some things that are only briefly mentioned in the book and expands them in an absolutely epic way! From awesome ticket sellers to spyglasses to danger, it is so gripping! It really highlights movies, which I love because movies are one of my favorite things. That's what this blog is all about! 
“Thereʼs more to a movie than just a movie just like a book can contain crucial secrets about the world of snakes or it can be used to prop open a refrigerator door when youʼre airing it out.”
I now wish that there was way more of this kind of content in the whole series. At the same time it really presses how much more comfortable streaming services are which was a hilarious promotion.
“Subtitles? This movie is boring already.”
Later, said by other characters:
 ʻ“If itʼs in English then why are their English subtitles?” 
“All the best movies have subtitles.”ʼ
(I actually said that to my sister today because we were watching a movie in English with English subtitles. Though I have to say that I usually don't like subtitles because they are so distracting and all I can do is read them. These episodes have made me change my mind.)
Good For: It's hard to say who would like it and who wouldn't! We watch it not because we like to see people in trouble. There is some warmth to this in the midst of darkness that is one of the reasons that I really like it. The other is that it is hilarious! It took me awhile to adjust to the humor, but it's worth a try! I feel like it's also good for siblings because the Baudelaires are so close through everything.
Age Range: It's rated PG I believe, and I think that's accurate. Just like the book, too!
Overall Score: 9!
Worth watching?: Absolutely for one reason in particular besides the fantastic additions with the movie. And that reason has a name: Montgomery Montgomery. As pointed out in my review of the book, I never liked Monty. I didn't trust him. But, watching this I just immediately loved Aasif Mandvi's portrayal! He is so welcoming, and wants the best for the Baudelaires. In the book he seems a little rude and full of himself (just a tiny bit) but here though he doesn't realize things, and as the intro says, makes a few mistakes, his heart is present through out. He is eccentric in all the best ways. I love him so much here!
So much of the dialogue has some double meanings and philosophy, too, which is so great to hear and interrupt.
“Now, I know the few dangerous reptiles can make you skeptical of the entire species, but, if you give them a chance, and you get to know them well enough to tell the dangerous from the good, I promise you: no harm will come to you in the reptile room.”
Will I watch again?:
Totally! These episodes are some of my favorite of the first season, if not the whole series.
Bonus thoughts:
“So, weʼre allowed to read all these books?”
“You are not only allowed, you are implored to read these books!”ʼ
I always have to throw a shoutout to Louis Hynes for making me actually like and relate to Klaus! I understand Klaus through this as he is heartbroken that his parents died and left him and his siblings, but heʼs also angry that they kept so many secrets from them. What were their lives truly like? Where they the people he knew or something else?



I can't decide which is better because it depends on the person! I personally like the tv show episodes, but others may like the book. I will say that the book is more mysterious. I remember the first time that I read it I was so shocked by a twist! It was one of the first times I remember being surprised like that. Rereading it I saw the foreshadowing, but it is still really cool. Here it takes that particular thing away and instead goes a route which would be more funny. I like both, but I'm glad that I got to experience the mystery first prior to seeing it obvious like that. If you have read the books but not seen this, I recommend it! It is really fun and quirky, staying true to books while branching out into new realms. It also hints more and more at things to come with tantalizing clues about the past!


That's it from me! Tell, am I the only one who gets really suspicious of new characters? Is there a show or movie based on a book that is different but you still really love it? Am I the only one who has a hard time liking Klaus? Is anyone else terrified by snakes? Thanks for reading!

MovieCritic

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Movie Review: Clue (1985)

Hello, and thanks for coming!

In the past I have written movie reviews for The Pirates of the Caribbean which is based on an amusement park ride, but this is the first time that I have reviewed something that is based on a board game! The game first came out in 1949 and this movie came out 36 years later. How do the two compare? Letʼs find out!

My guarantee: On ALL of my reviews there are NO spoilers unless I give you warning. My review of this is spoiler free!


Movie Review: Clue (1985):

Based on: the board game created by Anthony E. Pratt.
Six guests arrive at a mansion because they got a letter telling them to be there and are instructed to call themselves by an assigned name when they arrive. No one is sure why they are there until the butler Wadsworth reveals that they all have something in common: they are being blackmailed. Wadsworth lays out a plan on coming clean so the blackmailer can be arrested. Things go awry when the lights go off and someone is killed. Now there is a murderer among them and they have to find out who it is. Who killed Mr. Boddy and more importantly, who will be next?
And guess what, there are several answers because there are three different endings!
Genre: Mystery, Crime, Thriller, Comedy.
Length: approx. 96 minutes.
Script: 7, a name in vain is used several times.
ʻ“Are you trying to make me look stupid in front of the other guests?”
“You don't need any help from me, sir.”
“That's right!”ʼ
Crew: Directed by: Jonathan Lynn.
Written by: Jonathan Lynn & John Landis.
Starring:
Eileen Brennan as Mrs. Peacock.
Tim Curry as Wadsworth.
Madeline Kahn as Mrs. White.
Christopher Lloyd as Professor Plum.
Michael McKean as Mr. Green.
Martin Mull as Colonel Mustard.
Lesley Ann Warren as Miss Scarlet.
Lee Ving as Mr. Boddy.
Colleen Camp as Yvette.
Kellye Nakahara as The Cook.
Bill Henderson as The Cop.
Jane Wiedlin as The Singing Telegram Girl.
Jeffrey Kramer as The Motorist.
Will Nye as Cop #1.
Rick Goldman as Cop #2.
Don Camp as Cop #3.
Costumes: 5, the costumes are mostly all fitting for the 1950ʼs (which is when this is set), but there are two outfits that are either low, short, or tight, and they wouldnʼt be that bad, but the characters are constantly pointing them out or exaggerating them.
Costumes by: Michael Kaplan.
Cinematography: 9, this is a neat aspect! I mean, it is not 100% something original that Iʼve never seen before, but the darker atmosphere is so fitting.
Cinematography by: Victor J. Kemper.
ʻ“Why has the car stopped?”
“It's frightened.”ʼ
Music: 8, it very effectively gets you into the mystery mood right away. Each time that we have watched this our first comment is, “Nice score!”
Music by: John Morris.
Notes: I mentioned it above, but my favorite thing about this movie is that THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT ENDINGS. So cool!
Quotability: 9, ah yes. My sisters and I quote this movie so often. One part especially, there isnʼt much to put here because it is mostly a facial expression and repeating the same thing over and over again, but it is hilarious! “Flames...flames...”
Hey, look, I found a gif!
Content: 4, there is smoking, murder, killing, suicide mentioned, so much suggestive stuff along with open discussion about it, lots of touching each other in bad places, and body parts mentioned.
Originality: 10, a murder mystery with three endings? Iʼm going to keep saying this throughout this review just because I think it is so cool. Why donʼt more movies do this? 
Good For: Mystery fans, anyone who has played the board game, fans of the actors. 
Age Range: Even though I think it is only PG, I would say that it is at least PG-13. Just because of all of the comments that are filled with innuendo.
Overall Score: 7. I take the mean total of all of the numbers, and having such an original storyline really bumped it up!
Worth watching?: Oh yes! All of the actors had hilarious parts and, everybody say it with me, three different endings! My family and I watched a different ending each time we saw it, and I had no idea about endings #1 and #3, but on the last one that we watched (#2) I focused so much and guessed it! I was so proud of myself.
Will I watch again?: Iʼve seen all of the endings now, but I can still see this becoming a yearly thing that my family watches. Clue is one of my favorite board games, and I love that they made it into a movie!


What is “breening”? It is a term coined in the magazine Variety about the head of the Hays Motion Picture Production Code (in place between 1934-1968), Joseph I. Breen (he worked there between 1934-54). Certain things were or were not allowed in the Code. But, it was unlike just censoring things because self-regulators helped filmmakers during the production of films to come up with alternatives when there was a problem with anything that didnʼt fit in the Code.

What Iʼll be doing today is talking about what this movie would look like if it had been made in Code years when Mr. Breen was in charge.

I mean no offense to anyone who likes this movie! If you disagree with my suggestions and you like the movie how it was made, then lucky you! That is the final product that was released into the world! I really like the movie myself and have seen it three times and enjoyed it all three. I look forward to many rewatches in years to come! I just thought that this would be a fun challenge for me and because I did the murder mystery Gosford Park (2001) (which is one of my favorite posts that Iʼve written) for PEPS's last Great Breening Blogathon, I thought that I would carry on the tradition and since I had just watched this for PEPSʼs #AMonthWithoutTheCode2020,  it is what came into my head first.

This is a film that is actually impossible to “breen” as it is a “black comedy”, meaning a comedy that makes fun of murder or other dark subjects. There could be murder, mysteries, or difficult topics in a Code film, but they always had to be shown as something that was serious.

That being so, I decided to change anything that I could (without taking away from the story) to see how close we can get to a Code film.

THERE WILL BE SPOILERS FOR THIS MOVIE FROM THIS POINT ON. IF YOU HAVENʼT SEEN IT, READ NO FURTHER. 
Now, Iʼm going to give away a lot of details from the movie, but I will NOT tell you “who done it”. All of my changes will apply to the characters as a whole and the ending will not change that. I am still making you see the movie if you want to see the three endings for yourself!
Final disclaimer:
I am not an expert on the Motion Picture Production Code! Iʼve never read the whole thing, and my only knowledge of it comes from reading Tiffany and Rebekahʼs posts. This is just my second time, but they do it a lot, so for a full list of all of their “breened” films, check out HERE. Plus, if you want more information, about the Code itself, go HERE.

The writers of PEPS, the Brannans, have said that there are two kinds of problems when trying to “breen” a film: surface ones and core ones. Surface problems are bad language, poor costumes, and the like. It doesnʼt affect the plot and can easily be changed. Core problems are not gotten rid of so easily, as the deal with main parts of the story. But, instead of just saying, “You have to fix it!” the self-regulators would have discussions with the filmmakers about other possibilities. This is where “breening” a film by typing it is hard, as there is none of that good conversation about all of the possibilities. Iʼll do my best, though!

Surface problems in Clue (1985):
There are so many hilarious parts about this movie, what with clever lines, funny confusion, and expressions. But there are a few that are just distasteful and clog up all the good bits. My sister hates it when I use the term “suggestive”, but Iʼm going to be using it a lot here, sorry!

To be changed: 
Costumes and the constant staring at Yvette and other ladies. As I said in my Costumes part of my review, they are short, low and tight. Those two costumes are the ones belonging to Yvette and Miss Scarlet. A big part of the humor is making fun of this with suggestive staring and touching of body parts. This just isnʼt funny to me and I role my eyes in annoyance every time it happens. The costumes would be more covering and all of that would be taken out.
So many open and suggestive comments are present in this movie. The script is so good without it, I would just say that they could be removed! There is a mention of “sleeping with my wife”. Itʼs kind of a famous line, but in Code years it wouldʼve been changed to “be with my wife”.

A few times a name in vain is used and a different expression could be put in.

Part of the Code was that when a character was killed it was never shown on screen. Now, itʼs been two months since I saw it, but I think that it was pretty good in this regard. A light is turned off or we see the character's face before, but not during as it goes to a different shot when it actually happens.

Iʼm still trying to stay away from too many spoilers, but in one part the characters are trying to hid bodies by pretending that they arenʼt dead and decided to do it in the most suggestive way. One way was where they stuck a bottle in that personʼs hand and gave them a hat and it just looked like he was intoxicated and sleeping. While a cover up nearby is that two alive people were doing very suggestive things. They, for one, could just be sitting talking like regular people or playing cards or something. For the rest of the bodies, it could be changed to something similar to the "drunk" man.

Core problems in Clue (1985):
Here is the rundown for all of the main characters. Spoilers will really begin here, so it is your last chance to stop reading if you havenʼt seen the movie!

How all of the characters are being blackmailed:
Miss Scarlet - Ran a house of “ill dispute”. (When my sister reads this she will roll her eyes at my dancing away from words that I donʼt want to use). Yvette worked for her and Colonel Mustard was a “client” (How vulgar!).
Colonel Mustard - Besides the aforementioned thing, he was a war profiteer.
Professor Plum - Had an affair with a patient (“Oh, how disgusting!” That quote sums up my thoughts).
Mrs. Peacock - Was paying people to vote for her husband who is a senator.
Mrs. White - Had husbands who all died mysteriously.
Mr. Green - Is a homosexual who doesnʼt want that revealed because he could lose his job.

Possible changes:
This is very difficult because instead of having good characters vs. bad, they are all “shady”, they are meant to be unlikable, and we are supposed to be suspicious of all of them. So, most of this is fine and I donʼt have to change it!

The only one that I would change is Miss Scarletʼs. Maybe she ran some sort of speakeasy or forbidden saloon thing? Yvette wouldʼve been a waitress and Colonel Mustard would visit there but not for other reasons besides drinking.
Professor Plum should probably be changed too. Maybe he was experimenting with different toxic chemicals and it got him fired from his job? Itʼs also fine to just leave the affair as a rumor but remove the comments. As I said above, either way we should take out the really suggestive comments about it all.

I canʼt think of a way to change Mr. Green, but I donʼt think it is that necessary? I'm not sure what the Code's stand on that was. I've done some research, but I couldn't find anything. I'll leave it in, but any offensive comments to Mr. Green about it should be taken out.

There is “proof” of the things that each person is being blackmailed for, which takes away all of our suspicion, so I would remove it, but there is a critical reason why it is there. Part of it is that “the murderer” reads it and knows about the how the blackmailer got his information. Instead of the “proof” that we see in this movie (which is content heavy), maybe there could just be a list with names of everyone who might know something.

In each of the three endings when revealing who didnʼt do it, they should be proved innocent for the thing they are being blackmailed about. Somehow. My brain is starting to run out of ideas at this point, so I don't have any good suggestions.

ʻ“...and to make a long story short...” 
“Too late!”ʼ

That finishes off my “breening”! Check HERE for the other entries in this blogathon!


Remember though, I do have so much fun watching this movie! To prove it to you, Iʼll leave you with my sistersʼ and my favorite scene in the movie that we quote nearly on a daily basis:

ʻ“Wadsworth, am I right in thinking there's nobody else in this house?” 
“Um... no.”
“Then there is someone else in this house?”
“Sorry, I said ʻnoʼ meaning ʻyes.ʼ”
“ʻNoʼ meaning ʻyes?ʼ Look, I want a straight answer, is there someone else, or isn't there, yes, or no?”
“No.”
“No there is, or no there isn't?”
“Yes.”ʼ 
.......

A little later

.......
ʻ“Well, there is still some confusion as to whether or not there is anybody else in this house!”
“I told you, there isn't.”
“There isn't any confusion, or there isn't anybody else?” 
“Either! Or both.”
“Just give me a clear answer!”
“Certainly!....What was the question?”
“Is there anybody else in this house?” 
“No!”ʼ


Thanks for reading! If youʼve seen this what do you think of the changes that wouldʼve had to be made for the Code? Any changes that I missed? Has anyone else played the board game and loved it like I have?


MovieCritic
"If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, where you stop your story." -Orson Welles