"The book is a film that takes place in the mind of the reader." ~ Paulo Coelho
Showing posts with label I recommend it. Show all posts
Showing posts with label I recommend it. Show all posts

Friday, May 30, 2025

Ranking the 25 Films I Watched Throughout My Hispanic Studies Classes

Noche de fuego (2021)

¡Buenos días, todos!

I hope you're all doing well! It's been a hot minute since I posted because I've been really busy in school. That's all over now as I recently graduated with a minor in Hispanic Studies (I have a post on my major coming up, but it's taking a while)! 

To celebrate, I thought I'd commemorate all of the films I watched for my various Hispanic Studies classes! Which...was a lot. I mean, one class was specifically a Hispanic film class (where we watched 13 movies), but the other 12 were sprinkled around. There are so many other stories I could talk about (having taken Hispanic Theater and Hispanic Literature classes), but because this is Movies Meet Their Match I thought I'd start with films. Therefore, I'm going be ranking all 25 of the movies that I watched! Which, if you've been around for a while, you might have been wondering about from my yearly wrap-ups.

Even though I was trying to keep it short by only talking movies, this post is still ENORMOUS. So feel free to skim and skip around based on what sounds interesting to you!

How this will work: I'll provide a brief summary (written by yours truly so not all that official, haha.) and then thoughts on why it is ranked where it is.

This was harder than I thought. I have my strong dislikes and my ABSOLUTELY LOVE, but in the middle they're mostly on the same level.

All of these movies have varying levels of content, but I'm mostly going to be talking about what the story's significance was to me. On some, the content is why it is so low in the ranking which I will mention, but that's usually tied into other aspects. If you have any questions about the age ranges for any of these movies feel free to ask and I will provide details!


25. El conde [English title: The Count] (2023)

Premise: Chile's dictator Augusto Pinochet is actually a vampire. This has lead him to live longer so he's faked his death a few times. Now he doesn't want to live so his family is waiting for him to die and to get on with it his children hire a nun to exorcise him.

Hated it. Most of my class hated the gore and violence, but I was most upset about the assault. Yes, but it's probably shown as a bad thing...not really. This woman is raped but it's all set up as she gave in to the seducing eventually, with this whole ecstasy sequence and I was over it. I was very triggered. 

I think this has some creative ideas (Pinochet as a vampire! Who are other historical "vampires"?), but I did not like the plot at all. So much so that I stopped watching it and was doing sudoku while it played in the background. Just now I had to look up what actually happened to write the summary (thanks Wikipedia for the stark reminder that YEP, STILL HATE IT). My sisters and I joke about repressing things (it's a movie reference but I'm blanking right now on what movie...) but it's true. I do not want to think about this one, so moving on.


24. Memorias del subdesarrollo [English title: Memories of Underdevelopment] (1968)

Premise: While many left Cuba between the Revolution and the Cuban Missile Crisis, wealthy writer Sergio stayed. This collection of his memories is his disgust at the mentality and cultures of the people there in contrast with actual footage of things that happened.

I get the point now, but I feel like there should be a huge disclaimer of YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO LIKE THE MAIN CHARACTER. He is one of the most despicable people ever. And that's the point. Because he's supposedly lamenting all of these people who are "underdeveloped," but it is HIS memories that we're seeing, so he's the one who is "underdeveloped." Maybe that is a spoiler. But I feel you can appreciate it better if you know that going in.

I mean, Sergio is wanting to emulate Hemingway, if that tells you anything.

This is the only movie I've seen from Cuba, I think? So I appreciate that. This is a critique in so many ways, I just don't think I was ready for it. 


23. El buen patron [English title: The Good Boss] (2021)

Premise: Julio Blanco is owner of a prestigious scale factory. He is known in the business world as being a good boss, but in reality he is cruel. In order to gain awards, he starts getting involved in the lives of his employees. Meanwhile, someone he fired is fed up and wants to put the scales back in balance.

I watched this for extra credit. And, again, a character that you're not supposed to like is the main person we're watching. Which is my least favorite plot device. I am never going to get invested if I don't have a reason to root for the character! It has made me say, "That's Javier Bardem!" every single time I now see Javier Bardem in something. This was the first time I went to a cool independent movie theater in my college town, so I appreciated the excuse to go there.


22. Madres paralelas [English title: Parallel Mothers] (2021) 

Premise: Janis is a photographer who after getting involved with an archaeologist decides to raise her baby on her own. She bonds with a young girl who gives birth the same day she does, but after Arturo denies being the child's father, this leads to uncovering more secrets that Janis does everything in her power to keep buried.

I had such a hard time summarizing this because the things that are important to me in this film aren't the plot, but side stories that I wish HAD been the plot. This movie was made under a time-crunch because it was talking about issues happening in Spain at the time (finding the bodies of people who disappeared during the Civil War), but...it needs more editing. I was so bored watching this that I kept zoning out and instead thinking about how to re-cut it. Because do we need that many sex scenes? No. 

This has an interesting perspective on loss and hanging on to the past. I'd guessed what was going to happen through my theological studies, whether that was purposefully put in there or not.

An interesting one for the LGBTQ+ community, but I was put off by the age difference because I think Ana was still a minor? Also the adultery between Janis and Arturo is not what I'm here for. 


21. Retablo (2017)

Premise: Segundo is apprentice to his father who makes elaborate retablos--decorative boxes that display a scene inside them. His father is much revered for his artistry, but Segundo senses tensions. The stories that are on display are not the only stories being told and when Segundo finds a secret retablo he is conflicted on where his loyalties and love lies.

This one is important, but it's rough. I'd heard about it a lot from my professor before watching it and had it hyped up, so much that I thought it was about something else. The LGBTQ+ aspect is important, but I don't think it's that beneficial to the community. However, just because it isn't positive doesn't mean it's not realistic, and this looks at rural life, being trapped in tradition, and facing cruelty. I don't support all of the decisions here, but I think we can agree the society sets the characters up for failure.

My favorite part of this movie was the discussion we had in class where one of my classmates asked "What we would do if we were Segundo?" An essential question for everyone to grapple with who watches this.


20. Ixcanul (2015)

Premise: Maria is tired of her life below the mountain growing coffee---where she is about to be married off---and yearns to go North. Desperate to escape, she comes up with a plan where the boy she likes will take her to the U.S. when he runs away. Betrayed and now left with consequences, her mother asks for help from the gods within Ixcanul, the volcano where she lives.

The ending was so solid, really connecting so many elements from the beginning. I just HATED the beginning. The whole first half. I wish that we had started from half-way through? I get that there are supposedly important elements for the story, but I just don't think that we needed to see it on screen and we could've gotten exposition. I'd been so annoyed at this movie that I had been making lists on my computer while "watching" it until the middle. Then there was pay-off after pay-off that it was like watching a train crash but the story couldn't go anywhere else. And, ironically, that's when I couldn't tear my eyes off the screen.

The dynamic between Maria and her mother was so fascinating because Maria's mother will do absolutely everything for her daughter, but usually makes a decision without Maria's input. You can see that they love each other, but there are in a cycle of tensions that they continue to create. It also was really cool to hear the language Kaqchikel.


19. Neruda (2016)

Premise: Politician and poet Pablo Neruda is under warrant for arrest but no one can find him. Policeman Óscar Peluchonneau is assigned to find him and to do that decides to study Neruda's life and poetry. As Neruda continually evades him, Peluchonneau despairs that this is just like a story and struggles to break the ending that he sees coming for him.

This one was well-made and a different style than I'm used to seeing in Hispanic films (noir! We had a whole discussion about that. Even though I was the only one of my classmates who had watched a noir movie before. Old movies for the win!), but I just really don't like the figure Neruda. I was rooting more for Gael García Bernal (as you do). It was interesting to see how other people reacted to Neruda, even though I was screaming at the screen at one point that they shouldn't be.

Along with being noir, it is also a psychological drama in Peluchonneau's mind. The poor dear.


18. Todo sobre mi madre [English title: All About My Mother] (1999)

Premise: Manuela is a transplant surgeon in Madrid. After a surgery she never wanted to see, all hope for her future is gone. She decides to go back to the past and fulfill her son's wish of contacting his father. Through that, in Barcelona she finds an old friend and relives the past through helping a woman who is pregnant by her son's father.

This is an important movie (it's on 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die list, along with Memorias del subdesarrollo.), it just isn't my favorite. I get the cultural significance, but I don't think I'd want to watch it again because, even though it was a small part of the plot, the transplants hit me really hard as I know people who might have to be on a transplant list some day. I feel like I was missing something from it because I haven't seen All About Eve (where the title comes from) or A Streetcar Named Desire, which are big parts of the plot. Who knows, maybe I'll watch it again after I see those respective films. 

It's commentary on the AIDS/HIV epidemic which was so huge but because it was before I was born I feel like people tend to hush it up? People also tend to act as if the LGBTQ+ community is a new thing, but it really isn't, and the presence of trans characters in this film shows part of that. I would SO MUCH prefer this to be the token LBGTQ+ movie than Rocky Horror. This gives a compassionate look at these characters while also showing what it's like to live in a society where your options are limited. Manuela is such a kind-hearted character and I admire her so much.

I cried just at seeing Barcelona because at the time I was watching this I knew someone there.  


17. Pájaros de verano [English title: Birds of Passage] (2018)

Premise: Zaida and Rapayet go through the rituals of becoming a couple, but when Rapayet becomes involved in drug trafficking, and the traditional values and rituals are put to the side.

This one is a cautionary tale. In my class I remember talking about the similarities between this and The Odyssey, but when I went back through the slides it only had the question of "how is it similar?" and none of the answers. And I don't remember the answers. Or much of the plot, as is shown by my very weak description of the premise. I also don't really remember why it is titled the way it is (...I think it was the dance that Zaida did?). All in all, of all the movies on this list, I remember this one the least, which is why it's low in the ranking. So I probably should watch it again. 

It's about losing culture which is important because so often the stereotype of Hispanic countries is about gangs, but that's stepping away from what the culture actually is, which is the travesty.


16. Ya no estoy aquí [English title: I Am No Longer Here] (2020)


Premise: Ulises defines his life by his Kolombia style. Through a split timeline, the film follows Ulises's struggles for work in NYC as well as his old life in Mexico. From dancing in subways to sleeping on rooftops, Ulises feels the loneliness of not having his community---Los Terkos---all while trying to not get sent back home, even though that's where he longs to go.

I think about this one a lot. About Kolombia and cumbia and style and what it means to dance. This movie looks at how gangs aren't always bad, but when kids are in a space surrounded by violence then that forces them to become the biggest oppressors. This had the potential for exactly the kind of story I adore, but then took a different turn. Not that the result was bad, I just was disappointed from where I thought it was going. But it did it's job in making me think about it from time to time.

This was cool to watch because I'd just been to New York, so getting the perspective of the Hispanic culture there was a different angle than I'd just seen, but familiar at the same time. It's also a critique on the U.S. and how it is not as accepting as those moving there would hope for it to be.


15. Los reyes del mundo [English title: Kings of the World] (2022)

Premise: A group of boys have been living on the streets of Medellín, and though only two of them are related, the whole group is family. When Rá learns he can get his grandmother's property---seized by the years ago by the government but is now being returned---the boys start their way across the country to try to find home.

This one is so stinking rough. It's about kids who have no supervision and do whatever they want; one's heart breaks at the loneliness because even though they have each other, they don't have a future. They imagine a utopian world of white horses where they are the kings, but they have to deal with the dangers of this world, first, and the government and systems are set-up to make them fail. This is a kind of a world where the only kindness they receive is at a brothel.

The punches that this delivers were UNCALLED FOR. I'm still upset. The pobrecitos. For some reason the Columbian accent was harder for me to understand which I was very surprised about. I liked Laura Mora Ortega's directing and would love to watch more of her work (which reminds me to get started on the show Cien años de soledad...).


14. Roma (2018)

Premise: Cleo works for a wealthy family in the Roma neighborhood in Mexico City. The film follows her struggles: facing judgement for being Mixtec, caring for children while dealing with her unhappy employer, and her own unsatisfying relationship.

AKA the one that won so many awards. When I watched this I was so confused, as was my entire class. Once we had our discussion I think I understand it more? It is culturally significant (again, so many awards!) but it's not my favorite. Don't get me wrong, I think it deserved the awards. I just also think that there are many on this list that ALSO deserve awards but didn't get the attention because they weren't directed by Alfonso Cuarón.

What is my favorite, is the Billie Eilish song about it called "When I Was Older." Cannot recommend enough. 

If it wasn't apparent before this, I should say for those of you who haven't watched Hispanic films, the plot structure is very different than most Hollywood films. There are not the typical plot points, therefore the premise is difficult to describe. When we watched this for class I remember some people struggling with it being black and white, but my old movie watching came in handy and I was not put off at all.


13. Bardo, falsa crónica de unas cuantas verdades [English title: Bardo: False Chronicle of A Handful of Truths] (2022)

Premise: Silverio is a writer who splits his time between the U.S. and Mexico. The film follows bizarre moments in Silverio's life and imagination that walk through the history of Mexico and current issues as well as the history of Silverio and his wife as they deal with the grief of losing a child many years ago.

This one is teetering on the line of "okay" and "I LOVE IT." It's so weird, guys. And some of the segments are a little too weird for me, like the child who has Silverio's head. And the most disturbing sex scene of all time. But the rest of it?? The airport scene lives rent-free in my head and is one of my favorite things ever. "America is a continent not a country, *starts swearing*" Say it louder for the people in the back! I also love the ties to Julio Cortazar's "Axolotl." And the theatricality of Mexico's history that is so tongue-in-cheek. And the most realistic flying dream of all time (the cinematography!! Totally should've won an Oscar).

So yeah, I'd actually really recommend this one, and I'm going to firmly say now that it is in the "I LOVE IT" camp. Just be prepared (especially because the sex scene has no build-up. I get the symbolism, I just have no desire to watch it.)

I was also taking a Hispanic history class at the same time and seeing all of the Hernán Cortez references I felt very knowledgable.


12. Güeros (2014)

Premise: After some trouble, Tomás goes to live with his brother Sombra in Mexico City. Tomás's idol is Epigmenio Cruz who recorded the song on the tape that Tomás carries with him everywhere. Sombra, his roommate, and Tomás set out across the city, navigating zoos and student uprising to try to find Epigmenio Cruz. 

This one seems so casual compared to all of the others. But it's also the exact kind of story that I love? Sibling roadtrip? Not leaving town but discovering more about yourself? Looking for something that's lost? I don't know what it is. Besides the close up making-out that takes way too long (Chloe the editor at work again), I have no complaints about this movie. It's a vibe.

The thing that I love about these movies, too, is that there is so much to discuss because the answers aren't given. Things are left up in the air. In my Hispanic Film class, for each of the 13 films we spent two 75-minute class periods on it. THAT'S how much there is to say about these, but even then it isn't always enough. Like with this one. I would love to delve into each and every spot that they stop. So I wrote a paper that included this film. The only reasonable solution, you know.


11. Lo que arde [English title: Fire Will Come] (2019)

Premise: Benedicta's son, Amador, is recently released from prison. In the wilds of Spain, while it is away from prying eyes, everyone is still suspicious of Amador due to his history of arson.

I was in a bit of a fever dream watching this because it was 8AM and I had been up late coding. But I vibed with it so hard, it made me write a blog post. So even though I don't really remember much about it (hence the short description), I remember loving the colors and the cinematography. I also remember not understanding what they were saying and was thinking that I was just tired, but I feel justified in my confusion because according to Wikipedia this film is in Galician, not Spanish. 

Meanwhile all of my classmates hated it and I don't get why. It follows the idea that if you put someone in a box, labelling them and refusing to see who they really are, eventually they will succumb to that label.


10. La llorona (2019)

Premise: After a court case against Enrique Monteverde that ended in his favor, him and his family are stuck inside their house due to the protestors outside. It's no better inside as mysterious and supernatural appearances of water start to occur in his house. What he doesn't know is that the newly hired maid is not all that she seems.

If you're going to give me horror, my number one rule is that it has to mean something; it can't just be for the purpose of scaring people. And this does exactly that. It asks questions such as: what is justice? Who's telling the truth? What does it mean to trust people? All while being deliciously creepy in a poignant way of Guatemalan myths. 

If you've seen the movie Coco (2017), then you've heard one song about the pain of La llorona (which is one of my FAVORITE songs of the entire movie). If you are interested in a more creepy aspect of that same pain, then this film is for you. I also love the cameo of Rigoberta Menchu. Which is my reminder to read the book about her life.


9. Noche de fuego [English title: Prayers for the Stolen] (2021)

Premise: Ana lives with her mother in a small town, where they work harvesting poppy seeds. In the world of drug trafficking and more, Ana's whole childhood has had the fear that something bad is going to happen, but she's got her friends by her side, and with the words of her teacher she dreams of a better world.

The reason the English title is the most different than the Spanish title is because it was originally a book written in English called Prayers for the Stolen - by Jennifer Clement. Based on how much this story has my heart, I should read the book.

This one is very similar to Los pajaros de verano, but I think it's better done. Maybe because it's told from the perspective of a child? The fear that this movie is absolutely soaked in is heartbreaking, but the friendships between the girls are what carry it. I did a whole presentation about this movie and therefore I love it.


8. The Boy from Medellín (2020)

Premise: Musician J. Balvin prepares for a huge concert in his hometown of Medellín, Colombia, and contemplates whether he should address the politics of the country.

This is a documentary and it is the fault of this that I am always listening to "Mi Gente" and "Obra de arte" as performed by J. Balvin. This is such an interesting look at what it means to be a celebrity and when to use your voice. Because whether you speak up or you hold back, people are going to be angry at you. So what do you do?

This one is so high in my ranking because when I finished watching it I was in a really positive mood. Which isn't usually what happens with these movies, haha! I mean, you can't listen to "Mi Gente" and "Obra de arte" without smiling.


7. El abrazo de la serpiente [English title: The Embrace of the Serpent] (2015)

Premise: Just as a river splits into many different branches, this story splits into the different branches of Karamakate's life, both past and present. Past: Theo seeks Karamakate out as a guide to explore. Present: Evan seeks Karamakate out to help him find a sacred plant. Karamakate can't remember what happened last time, and goes to find his memory.

I originally thought this one was interesting, that's all. Now it's low-key become my "Roman empire." I think about it all the time, not only in my Hispanic studies classes but in theology, too. I love that this has over 10 languages. I love the double timelines. I love the commentary on "explorers" and "scientists" and what it means to protect.

The one thing I don't love so much is the ending because I don't quite get it? My professor was really excited about explaining the parallels between this and 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), but I hate that movie, so I wasn't buying it. All in all, the environmental commentary is excellent and I could be here all day talking about it.


6. Argentina, 1985 (2020)

Premise: Lawyers Julio César Strassera and Luis Moreno Ocampo take on a huge court case: a trial against the military dictatorship of Jorge Rafael Videla that ended two years ago. The idea that the government can get rid of anyone they don't like---"los desaparecidos" (the disappeared ones)---is a threat hanging over both Julio and Luis's lives.

If there was ever a movie whose setting FELT like a year, it's this. This feels like 1985. I mean, I wasn't around to see 1985, but that's what I think it felt like. 

I think I mention this every time I talk about a court drama movie, but I always expect it to be boring? Yet it never is. What sold this movie is the relationships. Julio has such a different dynamic with each member of his family, and I loved them all, but especially the quiet curiosity of his son. This kind of has a real-world-yet-Avengers-esque aspect of "let's build a team" that I LOVE. The clips from the actual trial, too, are incorporated so well. The fact that it blends together so well is another testament to how this movie feels straight out of 1985.


5. La teta asustada [English title: The Milk of Sorrow] (2009)

Premise: A woman suffered horrendous abuse from the invasion of a guerrilla group, and her pain transferred to her daughter Fausta through the very milk fed to her. Fausta is now processing her grief and fear, coping to protect herself yet causing different health issues. She starts working for a famous pianist to earn enough to bury her mother.

If I were to describe this as briefly as possible, it would only take two words: GENERATIONAL TRAUMA. This is seeped in magical realism that is looking at how to deal with that trauma. And it was kind of my first encounter with magical realism, not in the form of horror like La llorona. My classmates and I, separately, all had to pause and say, "wait a minute, a potato??" In the movie's world it is not considered strange but accepted as part of the magic.

I lead a class discussion in this (I think I went waaaaaaay over time) about self-protection vs. self-harm. Fausta needs a hug more than anything, but she also needs a way to not be afraid, and one's heart just aches for her throughout the movie.


4. No (2012)

Premise: In order to prove to international powers that Chile is not under a dictatorship, the people are getting to vote to answer the question, "Should Pinochet remain in power?" The two sides, "YES" and "NO", will each get a TV campaign to answer the question. Many are despondent, thinking that this is a formality and no matter the results, "YES" will win, but René is hired to run the "NO" campaign and is determined to convince the people otherwise.

In contrast to El Conde---also directed by Pablo Larraín about Chile and Pinochet---it's notable that I love this one so much. I think a factor is because we never really see Pinochet and instead are looking at the basic lives of the people who have been hurt by him. This uses a different political tactic than one usually sees: hope. It's genius and such a fascinating look at psychology and sociology.

And as a bonus, René's relationship with his son is precious. And it's Gael Garcia Bernal, so who are we kidding.


3. Volver (2006)

Premise: Raimunda has a lot going on: the consequences of her daughter's self-defense, running her friend's restaurant, her aunt's funeral, and on top of it all, a return from the dead. Alone, she tries to do everything for her daughter that her family didn't do for her.

I can't geek out about this movie enough. I was deliberately mislead to what it was about and that kind of made my experience all the better. It's about generational trauma and trying to stop it while also seeing what returns (the verb "volver"). I loved the Don Quijote references.

Penelope Cruz is STUNNING. I love how this focuses on the role of women, from opening with cleaning tombstones to running a restaurant, to grieving, to protecting one's family. I just dig this so hard. I go back and forth on whether I like No or Volver better, but today I'm in a Volver mood.


2. Los lobos [English title: The Wolves] (2019)

Premise: Lucia and her two sons have just come to the U.S.. Lucia does not have money for childcare so she leaves Max and Leo alone while she works, and they amuse themselves with stories of unstoppable ninja wolves and the hope of going to Disneyland. However, the scariest dangers might not be the adventures of their imagination, but the real world.

MY BELOVED. *sobs* This was the first movie I ever watched for a Hispanic Studies course and I immediately fell in love. It's reality and story telling and immigration and trying to survive all while kids are hoping for Disneyland. It's so hard but I love it.

I think it also hits hard because my first Spanish teacher back in High School looked SO MUCH like the actress for Lucia.

If you are interested in watching any film from this list, for a first Hispanic film, please please please watch Los Lobos. I don't think I need to say anything if you watch this. You will understand.


1. La noche de 12 años [English title: A Twelve Year's Night] (2018)

Premise: From 1972-1985, Uruguay was under a dictatorship. While those who were under the government suffered, even more so did the men who were imprisoned for those 12 years. Of nine people who were hostages, this film looks at the captivity of three of them: José Mujica, Mauricio Rosencof and Eleuterio Fernández Huidobro.

I can't tell you how much I love this movie. I wrote a whole essay about it and could write more.

This is far from an easy film to watch, which is why I recommend the more light-hearted Los Lobos for people just starting with this genre. La noche de 12 años is chock-full of torture, both mental and physical. Yet that doesn't make it any less worthwhile, because the persistence of the main characters is what gives me hope in this world.

Loneliness. Memory. People being treated with the utmost cruelty and my heart screams out THIS IS WRONG. Regardless of what these people did. Watching these horrors has made me want to be a better person.

This movie is actually the reason that I'm writing this post. The characters represented in this movie were real people. And one of them, José Mujica, passed away a couple weeks ago. I admire his persistence and humility and am so honored that I got to see his story told through this film.

Over winter break, my sister and I were summarizing the movies we'd watched in 2024 (as you do), and I started talking about how disappointed I was in the movie cover for this masterpiece. The one that I have above is pretty good because the words look like cells of a prison, but I wanted that included more. So I redid the poster.

And I'm pretty happy with the result. But of course, I'll have to rewatch the movie to confirm this is accurate...which, giving myself another reason to watch it, may have been my goal all along.


WHEW. That was a lot. If you made it through this monster post, thank you! 

Have you ever watched a movie for a class (the best kind of homework, am I right?)? Have you seen any Hispanic films? Have you seen any of these movies? If not, which of these sounds most interesting to you? Which do you think would be your least favorite? Have you ever wanted to remake a movie poster? Do you dislike vampires as much as I do? I'd love to hear all of your thoughts!

Until next time, my friends!

Chloe the MovieCritic

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

Book Reviews Featuring World War II King Arthur Legends, A Boy Named Jinx, and a Skilled Dressmaker

Hello, there!

It is that time of the month for me to review books for your enjoyment! It is my goal to do this each month this year, and so far I have done well with reviews in January, FebruaryMarch, and April.

This month is special as May is one of my favorite times of the year, despite the lack of snow. While some of the other months had reviews for books that I wasn’t too fond of, today I’ll be reviewing some of my favorites from last year! Each and every one of these books is a masterpiece, giving me a full range of emotion and suspense with the brilliant characters and dynamic setting. I hope that these reviews encourage you to read this fabulous works!

My guarantee: On ALL of my reviews there are NO spoilers unless I give you warning. I promise you that all three of these reviews are spoiler free! The endings or any surprises won’t be spoiled on my watch.


Review #1:

The Metropolitans - by Carol Goodman:
In 1941 four kids come together when there is an attempted robbery at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. What was almost stolen was a page from the Kelmsbury Manuscript, a book of the legends of King Arthur. These kids are united in a common quest, each linked to a character from this strange book. But, not the whole book is there and with the help of the curator they need to find the rest of the pages which are hidden in the museum. When Pearl Harbor is bombed, people of the city turn against Kiku and all other Japanese people and things. Will Madge, Walt, and Joe stand with her? Each have their doubts as connection to this book draws them closer to their biggest fears. Can New York be saved with their help?
‘The one thing she did know was that if the great wide world could come busting into HER life, then she could darn well bust into the world.’
Genres: Fantasy, Historical Fiction. Middle Grade Fiction. Young Adult. Is there a genre for the best books ever? If there is, then this would be in it.
Characters: 10!! These characters were the most magnificent thing that I have read in a long time. They are all so distinct, and DIVERSE, and from the moment I met each one of them I knew their hopes and dreams. It was because of them that I could barely stand to put this book down!
My favorites: (in no specific order other than alphabetical because how can I pick favorites from our four heroes?)
Joe: A Native American boy on the run from the law and who can't remember his language. His insecurities are so well drawn. He has seen people hurt in the past so he knows anger, but he also is ashamed of hurting others. How his story rotated around language was amazing.
Kiku: A Japanese girl who has always been made fun of and wishes that people trusted her. She wants to earn the respect of her father, but he is so strict nothing she does is right. She is so happy to have found a home in her passion for art and doesn’t want that to go away because of her heritage.
Madge: A bossy Irish girl who has been stuck with responsibility her whole life. Madge is incredible. If you want a fantastic female character, look no further! I love how she takes charge because no one else is going to! Regret is a big word in her vocabulary based on her temper, and she wishes she could change things.
Walt: A German Jewish boy who wants to stand up to tyrants but is scared that the ones he loves will be hurt. My sweet precious scared boy. His fight with cowardice makes my heart ache for him because I have been there. He just wants to keep his friends and family safe!
You can see from my descriptions how this is such a hard time for all of them. But, what I’ve said is just the tip of the iceberg for each of them. They are phenomenal and you need them all in your life this instant.
‘When people treated you like vermin, you began to feel like vermin.’
Words/Writing style: 10! No bad words and on top of that the writing is jaw-dropping. I feel like I always use that word to describe prose, but I can’t find anything that fits better! With third person past tense you are so seamlessly put into the minds and hearts of each of the characters. I love how we get to see what is happening from each of their point of views. The prologue is a little confusing and disconnected, but it is important and will make sense very soon.
World building/Setting: 10! I’ve never been to New York (or 1941 because I don’t have a time machine readily available), but this book put me in the midst of everything perfectly. I felt like I was breathing the same air as all of them. In the museum, in train stations, in their homes, in the park, all of it was natural. I read this around Peal Harbor day without knowing that was a factor and I FELT all of turmoil happening in New York City. From the mentions of the clothing they wore to the candy and tea they ate and drank. The tea was Barry’s for anyone interested. Good choice as I’ve been drinking that my whole life.
The magic is so beautifully woven in! I could talk about it for ages, but I’m going to make you read the book to discover how it works.
Quotability: 10. The lines in this book are to die for! I wanted to write everything down. This category is a little trippy when it comes to books because the fact of the matter is that I don’t usually quote books. I loved it so much I’m giving it 10 anyway.
‘“Why, you’re children!” he said, ruffing the top of his head as if trying to activate the brain cells inside.’
Content: 9. There are some deep subjects here, but they are handled so well! Early on we have descriptions of someone committing suicide, but it is horrible and not saying it is a good thing by any means. There are racist comments against Kiku and her father, but that is shown to be bad! Mentions of abuse, fighting, injury, and death. There is one suggestive comment, mentions of body parts on statues, and talk about underclothing.
‘He clenched his hands, remembering the impact of knuckles on flesh. It had felt good---and then it had felt bad. And the bad feeling had lasted longer than the good.’
Originality: 10! This might be the most original plot in any book I’ve read! But that might just be me obsessing over it. I love how much Ms. Goodman used the King Arthur legends! It is stunning and keeps you on your toes. I guessed one element, but that wasn’t a bad thing, just good foreshadowing.
Good For: families, friends, anyone who loves historical fantasy, anyone struggling with “fitting in” or having courage or trying not to forget ones past.
Age Range: The characters are all 13, I believe, but you don’t have to be that age to read this. I think this is categorized as Middle Grade Fiction. It might be a little intense for super young readers, but it is so clean. It has no trouble captivating an older audience (like myself) as well!
Overall Score: 10!!!!
Worth reading?: Don’t doubt it! Of course it was. These characters and their struggles have stuck with me months after finishing it.
Will I read again?: Yes! I want to so badly! I have a bunch of required reading that I have to read, but I want to visit again. My younger sister introduced this to me and now I’m trying to get my older sister to give it a go. All of this is making me want to read it again!
Bonus thoughts:
“...How can we vanquish evil if we don’t help each other?”
The Metropolitans is really awesome and gripping from the start. A good book! Nay, a grand book. Nay, a great book! Nay, the best book! It is amazing X a million. I am struggling to convey the excellence of this book in the right words. The characters have amazing backgrounds that are never left out. They all of strengths and weaknesses and we see them used so well. They’re broken little babies trying to save New York!
If you can’t tell, I love it and recommend it 100%!



Review #2:

Moon Over Manifest - by Clare Vanderpool:
Abilene is sent to live in her father’s hometown for the summer. A rundown old place, it is murmuring with memories of the past. Ever since Abilene hurt herself, her father has been distant from her. Feeling like she is losing him, she is determined to find out what his childhood was like. While staying in the same place her father lived in she finds a box of letters, from someone named Ned to someone named Jinx. Through them and the stories the diviner, Miss Sadie, tells her, she begins to see what the town was like in its former glory. It is disappointing though, because no one will talk about her father no matter how she prompts them. She wants to spend more time in the past, but maybe some secrets are carried into the present. Most importantly, is there still a spy lurking in the shadows?
‘Memories were like sunshine. They warmed you up and left a pleasant glow, but you couldn’t hold them.’
Genres: Historical Fiction, Middle Grade Fiction, Mystery.
Characters: 10. More amazing characters! We have a big cast here, but they all of quirks that make them unique and recognizable. This town is full of a colorful crowd if I've ever read one.
My favorites:
Abilene: This girl. I love her so much. She’s always lived on the road and been ready to move on, so she doesn’t trust people easily. She’s figured out the world and the people in it: all except her father. She’s so sure that she knows what a person will be like based on her types that she’s established. Also, her name, Abilene Tucker, is gorgeous. Probably one of my new favorite fictional names.
‘Mind you, I don’t really say y’all, but it’s usually best to try to sound a bit like the folks whose town you’re moving into.’
Jinx: His conflict was spot on. He was afraid of being not needed or wanted and just being nothing but trouble. The hijinks that he and Ned get into are so great!
Ned: Ned was just an utter sweetheart! He made me smile anytime he was mentioned. He was brave, kind, and gracious. He doesn’t know his past in a town chockfull of everyone who has a distinct tradition to follow.
Lettie and Ruthanne: These cousins were great. They were so gracious and easygoing, down for anything that Abilene was up to. Their spooky stories heightened the mystery as they had an inside scoop on the town already.
The Preacher: I can’t for the life of me remember his name and it’s driving me crazy. I am very ashamed. If anyone can help me with this, please do! Anyway. His quiet presence is so mysterious and comforting and the same time. I love how the town looks to him for answers and he usually has a good one.
Words/Writing style: 10. The first person tense from Abilene was so great. In addition to that, the way things were told from Jinx and Ned’s perspectives through letters and Miss Sadie added touches that set everything off so nicely. Sometimes in stories with dual timelines I want to read more about one than the other. 1917 on the verge of war was just as fascinating as a dusty and boring (according to Abilene) 1936.
‘But as anyone worth his salt knows, it’s best to get a look at a place before it gets a look at you.’
Setting: 10. The setting of a sleepy little town in Kansas fits the story to a bill. The descriptions unfold so well that you can just see the town! It was vivid in my mind. The town itself is almost a character and you can distinctly feel the differences through the years. It is so rich in culture, too! Manifest is home to people from all over the world and it is striking to read about.
Quotability: 10. Why do I even have this when it is impossible to rate?? I don’t have anyone to understand the quotes! I’m giving it a 10 all the same. The lines were so carefree yet had a hidden wisdom to them. I adored the writing so much!
‘A typewriter sat on a cluttered desk, its keys splayed open with some scattered on the desk like it tried to spell explosion and the explosion happened.’
Awards: 4: Newbery Medal (2011), Spur Award for Best Western Juvenile Fiction (2011), Society of Midland Authors Award Nominee for Children's Fiction (2011), Premio El Templo de las Mil Puertas for Mejor novela extranjera independiente (2011).
Content: 9. The Ku Klux Klan is in some parts but it is shown as being a terrible organization and nothing about it is justified. Nothing really happens with them, but I still appreciated that we didn’t shy away from it being a real thing. With World War I creeping up we have some descriptions of the fighting and losses it held, but it isn’t gory. There was quite a bit about the making and selling of alcohol illegally. Usually that would’ve bothered me, but since I am not interested in it at all and it fit what was happening in the story, I didn’t mind so much.
Originality: 10! Like the rest of the book, it was stellar in the creativity. I was getting a slight To Kill a Mockingbird vibe, but that was maybe just because Abilene calls her dad by his first name, Gideon, like Scout does for Atticus. Talk about respect and dignity for nations might also be a contributing factor for why my brain is making that correlation. (Wow, my vocabulary is going crazy on me today, haha!)
Good For: historical fiction fans, families, anyone who has moved to a new place, people interested in the time periods.
Age Range: Abilene is in some kind of middle school, I think, so she is relatable to that age. Don’t be fooled into thinking it can only be read for kids! This is an excellent book for all ages.
Overall Score: 10!
Worth reading?: Without a doubt the answer is yes. The mysteries in the town of Manifest are bewitching and capture your attention. I grew to love all of the characters more than I can say in a short period of time.
Will I read again?: Again, without a doubt! I had to read this really quickly for a challenge which wasn’t a problem because it was so fascinating, but I am looking forward to reading it again slowly and absorbing all of the details thoroughly.
Bonus thoughts:
This is an absolutely gorgeous book. It is about discovering the past and through that oneself. The foreshadowing was some of the best I’ve read, because you could see where something were going yet still utterly destroyed when they actually happened. I sat in my room sobbing for this book. Which I’m not sorry to admit, I just was surprised because I wasn’t expecting it at all.
Do you get the gist yet? (Shout out to Sam for convincing me to read it!)



Review #3:

Prairie Lotus - by Linda Sue Park:
While Hanna is sad about leaving her home in California, she is bravely ready for live in the frontier. Her father is opening a dress shop and Hanna’s dream is to make clothing for the store, but her father doesn’t think she is responsible enough. It is her passion as her mother taught her to sew and she loves it. Things could be good here. That is except for a problem that shouldn’t be one: Hanna is half-Asian. People out here are just as judgmental on how she looks as they were at home. Will that be a problem when she wants to go to school? How will she convince her father that she is ready?
‘A brand-new town, equal measures of promise and uncertainty, like the thin April sunshine in which it stood.’
Genres: Historical Fiction, Middle Grade Fiction.
Characters: 9. There aren't that many, but all the more time for our star to shine!
My favorites:
Hanna: While some were understandably one-dimensional, Hanna was far from that! I related to her in so many ways. Our personalities are quite similar. I have never dealt with how people treat her, but Hanna faces it with so much courage! All in all, I want to be Hanna when I grow up. I’ve never been fond of sewing, but her enthusiasm for it made me want to make something!
‘You stop thinking about yourself. That’s where the sadness is, inside you. You look outside instead. At other people. You do things for other people, it fills you with good feelings, less room for the bad ones.'
I can’t for the life of me remember anyone else’s name, but there were a plethora of interesting characters. Fear for the unknown rules a lot of their lives which is scary, but realistic. My additional favorites were a man who was helping Hanna and her father, as well as a boy Hanna’s age and his little sister. They were precious!
Words/Writing style: 10. If I were to describe this writing in one word it would be graceful. You are pulled so gently through the story it is very relaxing.
Setting: 10. Life on the prairie with Asian elements intricately mixed in as well as respect for Native Americans? *chef’s kiss*
Quotability: 9. Hanna has some great lines of encouragement and motivation for when she gets down. They should be my motto, too!
‘It seemed to Hanna that there were always a hundred reasons for disliking people and not nearly as many for liking them.’
Awards: So far nominated for: Asian/Pacific American Award for Literature for Children's Literature (2021)
Content: 10. There is a lot of bias against Hanna but that is shown in a negative light. Someone bumps into and grabs someone harshly causing some harm, but again it is shown as undesirable behavior.
‘Cruelty was painful. Thoughtlessness was merely exhausting.’
Originality: 10. This book is not fast paced. It is slow and steady which, to me, is one of its endearing qualities. It took a setting that so many of us are familiar with in books and movies, and somehow made it REAL. Everything that happens feels like it could’ve actually happened. Not too much happens, but what does is so realistic. I totally dug something so relaxing yet thought provoking.
Good For: Families, fans of the setting and historical fiction, anyone who has had to move, EVERYONE.
Age Range: If my memory serves me correctly, Hanna is about 14. I think it would be excellent for younger kids with the way it handles everything so well. And, it is something that adults need right now, too. Maybe even for a whole family!
Overall Score: 10!
Worth reading?: It is a new favorite, so the answer is yes.
Will I read again?: Of all these reviews today, this was the one that I read the longest time ago so I definitely want to read it again. Maybe someday with a friend to discuss the simple wonder of this artwork.
Bonus thoughts:
This is an ideal book for anytime, but especially now when hate is flying. The message of this book is KINDNESS. Hanna has such a pure heart and soul doing the best for people even though they are prejudiced against her. This is a message that needs to live forever and Linda Sue Park beautifully did that.
“For the person who is sour, do something sweet.”



It wasn’t until I finished it just now that I realized that all of these books are historical fiction. I guess you guys know what I read a lot of in 2020! These books were, respectively, my 2nd, 4th, and 5th favorites that I read in 2020. I’m thrilled that I got to review them for you today!

Thanks for reading! Have you read any of these? If not, you are missing out and need to fix this immediately! What are some of your favorite historical fiction books? Any with a magical twist? Tell me one that incorporates a legend of some kind. What about some books that promote kindness above everything? Or a book that takes place in two different time periods? I truly hope that you all enjoy these books as much as I did!

MovieCritic

Monday, April 19, 2021

Book Reviews Featuring a Colorful Castle, Fairy Tale Crocodiles, & a Lionhearted Math Genius, oh my!

 Hello book lovers!

I hope that you are all having a nice Monday! I’m continuing my goal of reviewing books as well as movies each month with bringing you three more reviews. Here’s what I did in January, February, and March. Since my last review post was such a hit, I’m following the same format! I’m still terrible at coming up with titles so you’ll have to tell me how well I did on this one.

While it’s been a while since I read two of these books, the third is fresh in my mind. Never fear, I took notes and remember enough to supply you with anything you would need to know.

Without further ago, onto the reviews!

My guarantee: On ALL of my reviews there are NO spoilers unless I give you warning. All three of these reviews are absolutely spoiler free!


Review #1:

The Blue Castle - by L. M. Montgomery:
Valancy Sterling has lived 29 years in a grey world when she gets a shock in the form. She’s not been feeling well which turns out to be a heart condition and the chances for her living out a year are unlikely. With determination she decides that she’s going to stop bowing to everyone else’s needs and make her own way in the world. Goodbye to her family who are always using her, goodbye to a colorless existence, and hello to life and experiences while she can have them. It might be hard, but she’s willing to make it work. What surprises away for her to take advantage of will she is living in this radiant new life?
“I’m sick of the fragrance of dead things.”
Genres: Classic, Fiction, Drama, Historical Fiction.
Characters: 8. We have quite an assortment! I love the little obsessive quirks of Valancy’s family that make them so laughable.
My favorites:
Cissy: Oh my goodness, I loved her. She was just a sweetheart who had gone through some dark times yet has such an air of goodness about her.
Abel: He was so well depicted that I just really liked him! I loved his relationships with people and how he processes his feelings is very realistic.
Barney: There is so much mystery around him that I’m going to keep it that way and not say anything.
Valancy: I’m talking about her last because I have a lot to say. I’m sure she was quite a breakthrough when this book came out! Valancy knows what she wants and goes to get it without ducking to anyone. She is very determined, adventurous, and brave. Quite admirable! On the other hand, something rubs me wrong about her behavior at times. I support her in so many ways, but in others she seems a little mean. Independence and spite are not the same thing. I fully support her going out into the world and living, but she just seems unnecessarily rude occasionally. I feel like there could be a better balance between what she claims to have been her whole life and her new attitude. I don’t deny that her family are all horrible and condescending! It was about time that someone told them off for that because that is not how you treat a human being! Her nickname they gave her is horrid. Who would change a glorious name like Valancy?? Telling Valancy that she isn’t good and is weak when they are all TERRIFIC examples. NOT.  I get all of that! Like in this occasion:
‘“I think,” said Mrs. Frederick, “that if a person makes up her mind NOT to have colds she will not HAVE colds.”
So that was the trouble. It was all Valancy’s own fault.’
Poor Valancy! I have been in a situation like this and it is awful to have someone tell you that.
The thing is, I really related to Valancy in the beginning. My family is great, but all of her feelings are so similar to mine, and while I like her character, I don’t want to be like her. If that makes any sense (if it doesn’t then know that it doesn’t make sense to me either). I absolutely 100% get the attitude (I understand it WAY too deeply) that if people are only going to understand you in that way you might as well do that. Like this:
‘People who wanted to be alone, so Mrs. Frederick Sterling and Cousin Stickler believed, could only want to be alone for some sinister purpose.’
Those two are obviously not introverts. They assume that Valancy is thinking mean things about them so she finally breaks one day and goes ahead and says anything that comes into her head. This part hit me really deeply:
‘She had always been told, ever since she could remember, that she must hide her feelings. “It is not ladylike to have feelings,” Cousin Stickles had once told her disapprovingly. Well, she would hide them with a vengeance.’
Do you see how terrible Cousin Stickles is? Why would you tell that to someone! I relate to her repressing her feelings for so long that all at once they come out and are all over the place. While it was right in her case, I don’t encourage other people to lash out at their families.
Overall, I think that she is a very fascinating character I don’t understand yet. I want to read this again and again to understand more what’s going on in her head.
Words/Writing style: 10. I have two examples for this. There is some mild swearing but it is made fun of. I thought it was really funny where in exasperation Valancy suggesed to Uncle Benjamin that he might say a swear word to feel better and he replied, “I can express my feelings without blasphemy.” He is the one who was usually saying the d word which is why it is hilarious.
But, MC, if there are a few words then why did you give it a 10 instead of a 9? Well, this book has THE MOST GORGEOUS WRITING I’VE SEEN IN MY LIFE. I’m not kidding. Before reading this book I would always say that I don’t care about the writing style and just wanted a story, but this proved that writing can be amazing. Read this:
‘The garden was lying in the magic of the warm, odorous July twilight. A few stars were out and the robins were calling through the velvety silences of the barrens.’
Quotability: 8. I haven’t had the chance to quote them to anybody, but that doesn’t mean that I haven’t thought about them a lot.
Content: 9. There are some scandalous things that happen! Oh dear! Not really! Valancy’s family thinks they are outrageous but it’s really nothing. Actually, the only things here are some drinking, a story of a girl having a baby without being married, talking about death, and someone being a little too friendly to a lady before he is stopped. I thought all of those things were handled really well so I don’t have a problem with any of it.
‘The only fault he found with her was that she did not sing at her word.
“Folks should always sing at their work,” he insisted. “Sounds cheerful-like.”
“Not always,” retorted Valancy. “Fancy a butcher singing at his work. Or an undertaker.”
Abel burst into his great brood laugh.’
Originality: 9. It is such a creative and cute story! I was just rereading one part of it now while looking for a line to put here and I couldn’t stop smiling. It follows one trope that is not my favorite, but other than that it is stellar.
Good For: Anyone looking for a new beginning in life, anyone looking for amazing writing, anyone who wants a pretty little story.
‘After the meal was over they would sit there and talk for hours---or sit and say nothing, in all the languages of the world...’
Age Range: One factor that I really love about this is Valancy’s age. She’s 29 so that gives it such a fresh and new take for a book! It’s not about your standard teenager, but at the same time anyone can enjoy this story. It would be fine for any and all ages.
Overall Score: 8.
Worth reading?: Yes! The writing makes me feel like I’m drinking sunshine. Totally worth it for that!
Will I read again?: This is a yes because I need to sort out my feelings on it. I go back and forth on what I think of it so I look forward to reading it again and again!
Bonus thoughts:
Basically everyone I know who has read this book loves it. If you came here expecting the same from me then I don’t know what to say to you: I don’t feel the same adoration that everyone else does. Don’t get me wrong, I loved it while reading it and the writing style is my go to example for spectacular writing, but thinking about it almost a year later I have some problems with it. It is super cute and lovely, but there is just one trope that I can’t stand. It had potential to be really inspiring, and while there are elements of that, it fell stale for me in a few places. A few things that were supposed to be surprising just felt thrown together. If you loved this then I am happy for you! I recommend it, but I’m still a little conflicted on my feelings in a few places.
“October—with a gorgeous pageant of color around Mistawis into which Valancy plunged her soul. Never had she imagined anything so splendid. A great, tinted peace. Blue, wind-winnowed skies. Sunlight sleeping in the glades of that fairyland. Long dreamy purple days paddling idly in their canoe along shores and up the rivers of crimson and gold. A sleepy, red hunter’s moon. Enchanted tempests that stripped the leaves from the trees and heaped them along the shores. Flying shadows of clouds. What had all the smug, opulent lands out front to compare with this?”



Review #2:

I, Coriander - by Sally Gardner:
Coriander has seven candles, just enough to last the night and tell her story. She had a happy and magical childhood with her parents. That was before objects came into her life: a stuffed crocodile, a pair of shoes, a set of pearls, and a mysterious raven. She didn’t know the significance of these objects at the time but now she does. Who is she truly and what was her story?
‘I wish I could unpick the stitches of time that have become all tangled and twisted together...”
Genres: Fantasy, Historical Fiction.
Characters: 6. There were some that were monsters but they were the villains and not shown as good in any way. There were a few that I could get behind, but they didn’t really have memorable personalities that were cutting edge, you know?
My favorites:
Esther (at least, I think that was her name...): I love how she broke so many common tropes for people in her circumstances! The poor dear was so nice.
Gabriel: He was adorable! He was so caring and his relationship with Master Thankless was the best.
Master Thankless: From the beginning of when we meet him with the irony of his name I knew I would love him. His loyalty to his friends is so honorable and he is great all around.
Daines: It was good to see a solid character! She was so reasonable when no one else was.
Coriander’s father: While he makes a lot of mistakes he didn’t surprise me with being unpredictable.
‘A silent man can seem many things until he opens his mouth.’
Coriander: She is way more likable than a lot, but I still didn’t love her. It could be that the narrator of the audiobook (Juliet Stevenson) wasn’t my favorite, making Coriander really annoying. But, maybe that was the point because she matured a lot! There were some parts near the end where she really stepped into herself and I got a little misty-eyed.
Words/Writing style: 7. There were a few bad words and some that were just poorly chosen. I liked the first person present tense, but I was so frustrated by the whole “candle” thing because I wasn’t paying attention at the start of the book and missed that. I finally had to ask my sister what it meant because she had read the book before. Besides that it was a unique writing style.
‘I have learned that there is a great power in words, no matter how long or short they be.’
World building/Setting: 7. Part of the beginning is in England in 1643, so the era of Cromwell and Puritans and Charlatans. Combined with that is a magical world. That magical world was really cool! I just wanted to know more about that I didn’t like any of the times that we were in the real world, which was so grey and didn’t compare to the colorful masterpiece. Was that they point, to show such a contrast? I think so, but I didn’t appreciate it. Just give me my happy fairy land!
Quotability: 5. Not terribly quotable, but I there were lines worth writing down. This was my favorite:
“We are but shadows that have a short time dancing in the light.”
Awards: 2: British Book Award (2006) & Nestlé Smarties Book Prize for 9–11 years (2005).
Content: 6. Yikes. Where to start? There is murder, disgusting things, suggestive things (including names), and abuse. So much abuse. Involving starvation and physical and mental beatings for children and elderly. It’s shown as bad and evil, but it’s still horrible to read about! I had to stop a few times because I couldn’t stomach it. I’m not saying that Sally Gardener should’ve glossed it over. I don’t know what I’m saying, okay? It gets graphic. I was not expecting that, so maybe if I was more prepared I could’ve handled it better. I wasn’t in a good headspace to deal with that at the time, but I forced my way through which might have made matters worse.
Learning about the things that happened with the times of the Puritans always makes me really sad but grateful that I didn’t live back then. There are evil preachers and while I realize that was accurate to the time, I wish there were some religious characters to contrast that. Not everyone who loved God was bad! The best example was probably Esther. My sister says I’m being too picky and I probably am.
Originality: 9. This gets this high of a score because of one element that came back around and made me extremely happy. From the first chapter it was worked in and it seemed random but it was involved at just the right times.
Good For: People who like history and fantasy combined.
Age Range: If you can’t tell from my content section, I was very triggered at certain points. This is probably PG-13 but it really depends on the person. I wouldn’t have been fine with it until I am as old as I am (Am I fine actually? *nervous laughter*) but my sister was fine when she was younger and she read it. I would tentatively set 15.
Overall Score: 6.
Worth reading?: Yes, it was. I really liked the glimpses of the magically world that we got  to see and will now imagine my own stories using all of the amazing factors.
Will I read again?: Nope. I can spare my time for something better. I listened to an audiobook version while doing the dishes which was nice, but I don’t need to do again.
Bonus thoughts:
‘When I was small I used to hide under my mother’s petticoats and listen to friends and neighbors as they brought their ailments to her like posies of sorrows, to be made better by one of her remedies.’
I was intrigued by this because my sister told me it had lots of fairy tale elements. Awesome, right? Basically, this book took everything that I don’t like in a fairy tale and put it together. It was dark, random things happened because “MAGIC. It makes everything better”, romantic relationships that had no basis for being there, gruesome deaths. There was a lot of potential! People being turned into animals? Mysterious fairy court dynamics? Medler (can we get a whole story about him??)? Instead the whole story hung on some weak and poorly explained plot points. Things were thrown in there to be convenient and for surprises that made no sense. As Abbie Emmons always says, “A confused mind always says ‘no’.” I was confused for the whole time and I just wanted to yell, “Why? WHY? WHHHHHHHHY?”. I did more that want to do it, I actually did yell. If my sister wasn’t the one who recommended it and I knew she would have answers I wouldn’t have kept reading it. My first reaction when I finished it was to call her and ask, “Are you kidding me?”
Now, she liked it a lot, so some of you may, too! I don’t discourage reading this, I only want to let you know how I feel about it, too. I didn’t get the point of it, but I would love to talk about it to see if anyone else got something out of it.



Review #3:

The Lions of Little Rock - by Kristin Levine:
In Little Rock, Arkansas, Marlee goes to school like everyone else. She likes doing math, but there are things that she doesn’t enjoy like being social and trying to make friends with her crush J.T. between doing his homework. When she meets Liz everything changes. She’s always struggled with talking, but she finally can with Liz who is nice, understands her, and brings her math puzzles. But Liz is harboring an illegal secret. Marlee starts to see the injustice in her hometown and wonders, can she be as brave as the lions in the nearby zoo to stand up to it?
“Let’s start solving the world’s problems. One step at a time.”
Genre: Historical Fiction.
Characters: 9. We get a diverse group! Besides Sally who was your typical mean girl, everyone had such interesting motivations.
My favorites:
Marlee: I feel called out here, but I am basically Marlee in every single way possible. Like math? Check. Has trouble with talking to people? Double check. Seeing her journey was really motivating to me because if she could do something, than I can, too, right? I’m not scared of heights, but that’s the only difference between us.
‘He shook his head. “It’s always the quiet ones who are the craziest.” But he was grinning again, and I knew he was teasing.’
(Paraphrase)
Liz: Marlee and Liz are such great friends because they are so different from her. Do I now want a friend like Liz? Yep, I do.
Little Jimmy: I don’t remember detail about him, but he was sweet!
J.T.: His character went somewhere I didn’t think it would go and it was a new take! I liked him a lot.
David: I want to hug Marlee’s big brother. He was great! Judy was nice, too, but I really liked David.
‘That night I lay in bed wondering how many other times David had grinned and fooled me, too, even though he’d felt awful inside. The idea that my big brother sometimes felt not good enough was strange, and a bit scary.’
Words/Writing style: 8. There is some name calling but it is shown as bad. It was super easy to read and I really liked the first person past tense. I am a sucker for first person. It puts you so nicely into the characters head!
Quotability: 8. I haven’t had the chance to quote it (seriously, MC, why is this such a big deal? I have no idea), but the lines are great.
‘Because all the words in the world won’t do much good if they’re just rattling around in your head.’
Awards: 3: Pennsylvania Young Readers' Choice Award Nominee for Grades 6-8 (2014), Rebecca Caudill Young Readers' Book Award Nominee (2014), & New Mexico Land of Enchantment Award for Young Adult (2015).
Content: 9. This is talks about true stories of murder and the Ku Klux Klan. It all shows that racism is a terrible thing! It is handled so well. It also has vandalism and explosions which are both dealt with just as well.
Originality: 10. This is such a good setting for historical fiction! The characters are unique and have good fears and things to face. Between referencing true events and having experiences like riding in an airplane for the first time it makes you really believe that you are there in 1957.
Notes: It mentioned the book Heidi and I had just finished reading it the book before! It also briefly mentions the movies The Wizard of Oz (1939) and Dumbo (1941).
Good For: Everyone, anyone who loves math, anyone who wants a good book about racial justice, anyone who is afraid of using their voice.
Age Range: A great book for all ages! The main characters are in middle school so it is relatable to kids that age, but it also ties in important historical events that are good for anyone to know.
Overall Score: 9!
Worth reading?: Yes! It was perfect for me personally because of how much I relate to Marlee, but it was also valuable for an in depth look at the things that were going on at that time.
Will I read again?: I’m looking at my sister’s trusty copy (which I bought her, by the way) as I write this and am thinking it’s about time to read it again, so the answer is definitely yes.
Bonus thoughts:
“Maybe they’re tired of being seen as second best.”
Of all of the books that I’ve read today this is my favorite! I like it a lot and have no reason to write a long rant about it. Try it yourself!



Whew, I’m done! Another full day of writing reviews done. It looks like I’ll barely get this in on the 19th because of that. It’s better than what I did yesterday when I decided to ram my face into the sidewalk resulting in a swollen face (long story). How are all of you doing??

Thank you for reading! Have any of you read this books? Do any of them look interesting to you? What is your favorite writing style you’ve ever read? Has a book had potential but fallen short? Who are some book characters that you relate to? Good night!

MovieCritic
"If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, where you stop your story." -Orson Welles