"The book is a film that takes place in the mind of the reader." ~ Paulo Coelho

Friday, November 13, 2020

Kirito from Sword Art Online [guest post by ThunderbirdQueen]

Hey, guys! The following is an amazing guest post from Thunderbird Queen as an entry in my Fifth Costume Blog Party. A huge thank you to her for doing this! Enjoy reading about this incredible character and seeing TQ's epic costume! I can't stop screaming about it! You should check out her blog HERE, because she has awesome posts.

MovieCritic


Hello, everyone! 
This is Thunderbird Queen from The Winchester North Star. For MovieCritic’s Fifth Costume Blog Party, she has so graciously let me participate in way of writing a guest post! This Blog Party is a really fun idea and I’m so excited to be participating! I don’t really celebrate Halloween, but I welcome any chance to get dressed up in costume. For this post, I decided to be the main character from the TV show Sword Art Online. I’ll be unpacking the general synopsis of the show, and the character himself. And there will be SPOILERS down the line. Without further ado, let’s get into it!


Anyone can fight. It’s just a choice of whether you should.” - Kirito



~ Synopsis ~

Let’s start with a brief synopsis of the show itself. Sword Art Online is an anime show, and I understand it’s not for everyone. The title is a reference to the latest virtual reality game in the show. At the launch of the game, thousands of players sign on… only to realize they can’t sign out. To escape, they have to clear all levels of the game, and dying in the game means dying in real life. 

Enter Kirito, the show’s main character. He’s a lone player with exceptional sword skills, arguably the most powerful one. Like any good fantasy hero, he’s brave, handsome, and smart, and ultimately wins the day in the end. 



~ The Character ~

On the surface, Kirito seems like a typical action hero, who can do no wrong, finds love, and saves the day. To some extent, this is true. However, one of things that sticks out to me about him is that he understands his actions have consequences. And sometimes he doesn’t handle it very well. For example, he is forced to kill a few other players in game throughout the series, which kills them in real life. Though it was in self- defense, there is an arc dedicated to him battling that guilt that he killed real people. He also has to deal with some of his friends dying, and distances himself as a result. 

Another one of his best traits is his loyalty. Throughout the series run, he (understandably) has a lot of girls crushing on him. However, he loves one and one girl only. Not once does he turn his back on her or look at anyone else. He learns to have friends, and stands by them and his family always. 


Now, let’s talk power and skills. He is the strongest player in the series (he has to be, as the main character, right?), in which part comes from his sword fighting techniques. As the player with the fastest reaction time, he was granted a rare skill, one that’s pretty much a garuanteed win in any situation. This is called Dual Wielding, where he can fight with two swords at once. The attack is called Starburst Stream, probably one of the coolest attack names ever. On top of that, he’s called the Black Swordsman by others, and his secondary blue sword was partially made from a dragon. 



~ Favorite Moments ~

I would have to make a whole post about Kirito’s most epic moments, but I think I’ll have to settle for just a couple. The first is when he used his dual wielding for the first time. He initially was reluctant, but he eventually took on a massive minotaur by himself with his two swords to save his friend and the love of his life. The strain nearly killed him, but it remains one of the best battles scenes I have ever watched. 


The second has nothing to do with fighting. Instead, it’s a tender moment shared between him and Asuna, the girl he loves. Both stuck in a game where they could easily die any day, they don’t waste time dancing around their feelings. Instead, he’s very blunt and asks her to marry him, to which she readily agrees. Other fictional couples really need to take a page from his book and bypass the denial stage. 



~ Final Thoughts ~

I love this show, and I love the characters. Kirito is by far my favorite, if you couldn’t tell. Sword Art Online is what got me into anime to begin with, and I’ve never regretted it. And, if anyone was wondering, those are real sword replicas in the pictures. They are very long, and weigh about ten pounds a piece, just like actual swords. They don’t have a sharp edge, but I don’t exactly want to dig my skin into it and test exactly just how sharp it can be. 


I hope you enjoyed this post, and once again huge thanks to MovieCritic for letting me do this. Photos were courtesy of a good friend, and you can find her on Instagram @lovely.co.photo. Without her, these would not have turned out this good!


Signed,

TQ 

Thursday, November 12, 2020

My Fifth Costume Blog Party is Here!

Hello, hello, hello!

Today is the start of my Fifth Costume Blog Party! I honestly can't believe that I've been doing it for this long.


This is running for three days, so you can post today or on the 13th or 14th! Of course, if you need a little more time I'll accept late entries. I will be posting a guest post tomorrow, and my costume on Saturday.

Leave me a comment with a link to your post on this post and I'll put it here so we can all go and read it.

Don't know what this is about, but are curious? HERE are the rules with my announcement post. If you have a different idea from originally that is totally fine! I was going to write about a costume that I had a few years ago, but at the end of October I had inspiration for something else, so I'll be talking about that. I'm very excited! And, I can't wait to see all of your posts!


The roster of posts:













...You're next!


Thanks for reading and participating! Keep checking back on this post over the next few days as new entries go up. What is your favorite costume from the entries?

MovieCritic

Monday, November 9, 2020

Movie Review: Lawrence of Arabia (1962)

Hello, everyone.
Before I get into my review I want to say how deeply saddened I was yesterday when I heard that the world had lost Alex Trebek. His battle with cancer was so hard. Jeopardy! is one of my favorite game shows, and his reassuring presence will be missed more than I can say.


Last winter my dad, older sister and I got onto a kick of watching Best Picture Oscar winning war films. It was all my idea because I am trying to watch movies off of my 1001 Movies To See Before You Die list. We watched three movies: The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) in October, Lawrence of Arabia (1962) in January, and Patton (1970) in February. After that we were really burned out because they were all multi-hour spectaculars, but we are thinking about starting another round as there are still many that we havenʼt seen. Iʼve reviewed the other two, so now itʼs time for the final one!

My guarantee: On ALL of my reviews there are NO spoilers unless I give you warning. This is spoiler free! Which was hard to do, but I succeeded.


Lawrence of Arabia (1962):
Based on: The life of T. E. Lawrence, from Seven Pillars of Wisdom - by T. E. Lawrence. 
During World War I, T. E. Lawrence is given a new task from the British army. He is sent to talk with Prince Faisel about helping them with his army of native people against to Turks. To do that, Lawrence must journey through the desert. It is hard, but he bravely goes forward into the desert, befriending all whom he can and trying to collect various tribes into an agreement. He is known for his insolence and daring, and continues that as he ignores his orders and suggests new, daring, and reckless plans of attack. Is it possible for all of these people to follow him, and how will he accept the respect and admiration that he is receiving?
“Big things have small beginnings.” 
Genres:
Biography, Drama, War.
Length: approx. 228 minutes. You read that correctly, this movie is so long itʼs crazy. We actually watched it in four parts over four nights because of that, with about an hour each time.
Script: 8, only one bad word and one time a name is taken in vain.
“It seems to me that you are free to choose your own name.”
Crew: Directed by: David Lean. Written by: T.E. Lawrence, Robert Bolt, & Michael Wilson.
Starring:
Peter O'Toole as T.E. Lawrence.
“Time to be great again.”
Alec Guinness as Prince Faisal. 
Omar Sharif as Sherif Ali.
Anthony Quinn as Auda Abu Tayi.  
Jack Hawkins as General Allenby.
Claude Rains as Mr. Dryden
Anthony Quayle as Colonel Brighton. 
Arthur Kennedy as Jackson Bentley.
José Ferrer as Turkish Bey.
Donald Wolfit as General Murray.
Michel Ray as Farraj.
John Dimech as Daud.
I.S. Johar as Gasim.
Gamil Ratib as Majid.
Zia Mohyeddin as Tafas.
Howard Marion-Crawford as Medical Officer.
Jack Gwillim as Club Secretary.
Hugh Miller as R.A.M.C. Colonel.
Notes:
If you read anything about this movie, you know the craziness that they went through with casting. Almost every character was cast multiple times. They say that they tried so hard to make Alec Guinness look like Prince Faisel that while they were shooting the film in Jordan some people who knew the late Prince Faisel actually thought it was him. José Ferrerʼs role is so small that I barely remember it, but he had a salary of $25,000, which was more than Omar Sharif and Peter OʼToole put together had.
Costumes: 9, there are times when people arenʼt wearing shirts, but it didnʼt really bother me. In fact, one of my favorite parts was all about clothing (am I being vague? Yes, yes I am).
Not this part. But, first thing into the movie my dad said, "He looks like Maz Kanata."
Costumes by:
Phyllis Dalton.
Cinematography: 10, guys, guys. GUYS. My sister and I were talking and wondering how much time they spent just filming this stuff because it is pretty incredible. These sweeping desert scenes are jaw dropping. There is a scene that is like, 10 minutes long, where we are doing nothing but staring at the desert. Iʼm not kidding (okay, maybe it isnʼt that much time, but itʼs a lot). Another scene where my sister and I just couldnʼt believe our eyes is kind of a spoiler to mention, so I wonʼt, but it was like nothing Iʼve ever seen. You have to see it to believe it.
This image doesn't do it justice.
Cinematography by:
F.A. Young.
Music: 9, after watching it I had the score stuck in my head for days and would do nothing but hum it. I donʼt usually have that happen. Something about it is so gripping! You can tell that since then it has inspired lots of things. I especially noticed parts that reminded me of Aladdin (1992). Iʼm listening to it right now, and Iʼm sure Iʼll have it stuck in my head for another couple of days now.
Music by: Maurice Jarre.
Quotability: 5, I havenʼt quoted this at all since then, but thatʼs not to say that there arenʼt good lines. I sadly canʼt put too many because I canʼt read my handwriting when I took notes. Ooops.
“Yes general, you have lied most bravely.”
Oscars won: 7: Best Picture, Best Director (David Lean), Best Music Score -- Substantially Original, Best Sound, Best Art Direction -- Color, Best Cinematography -- Color, and Best Film Editing.
Peter OʼToole was nominated for Best Actor, and while he did a great job, Iʼm very happy that Gregory Peck won it for his role of Atticus Finch in To Kill A Mockingbird (1962). Whenever I talk about the Oscars Iʼm bound to mention the 1962 ceremony because so many good movies were made that year!
Content:
6, this movie is intense, and a lot of that comes from the content. There is a lot of death, killing, blood and fighting, as this is a war movie. Something that was talked about was enjoying killing people. I think that what they had to say was important, but it couldʼve been handled a slight bit better just to make one or two things more obvious. All the same, it is made to show how bad war is.
Originality: 9, I always feel obliged to give stories based on real people a high score here because their lives are all so different. In addition to that, it really ripped me apart more than most stories do. Points for originality there! About halfway through I felt where it was going. I didnʼt know the exact details, but I just had this feeling that I knew was what I was supposed to feel at the end.
Good For: History fans, fans of the actors, fans of amazing cinematography and music. Honestly, I think that this is one of those movies that everyone should see sometime in their life, if they are willing to spare that many hours. It is by no means a cheerful movie, but it is important.
Age Range: It is rated PG but I should note that this was before there was a PG-13 rating, so it would probably get that nowadays. It is grueling to watch this because it is so long. I have a hard time paying attention for that long and Iʼm sure most little kids are the same way. Just because of that I would say it is best for 15 and older, but there is a possibility that it could be a good history lesson to someone a little younger, too.
Overall Score: 8.
These two were my favorites.
Worth watching?:
Yes, Iʼm very glad that I watched it. The way that the orphan boys Daud and Farraj treated Lawrence (and said his name) was so cute. As I said, this movie will really tear you apart because of how intense it is. Iʼm feeling all destroyed just thinking about it. This was the middle film that my dad, sister, and I watched, and I liked it in the middle. I didnʼt love it as much as The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957), but I didnʼt dislike it and find it as boring as Patton (1970).
Will I watch again?: My younger sister has never seen it, so I think that Iʼll show it to her some day, but maybe years from now.


For the blogathon:
I havenʼt been able to join in the last two years, so I made sure of it this time. When looking through the list of films that Claude Rains made I saw this and decided that it was perfect timing.

The amazing thing about this movie is that most of the characters are based on real people! There are some fictional characters in here for the sake of the story, but they all feel like they couldʼve been real as well and some were based on a few different real life characters and just combined into one.

The “real life” characters are:
E. T. Lawrence, Prince Faisal, Auda Abu Tayi, General Allenby, General Murray, Daud and Farraj, and Talal. (I know this thanks to Wikipedia).
The “fictional” characters are:
Sherif Ali, Mr. Dryden, Colonel Brighton, and Jackson Bentley. (Check out Wikipedia HERE for more details on who they are based on)


As you see, Claude Rainsʼs character is fictional, but all the same he is important to the movie. We donʼt get a lot of screen time with him, but you could say that he initiates Lawrenceʼs inciting incident. (Can you tell that Iʼm in the craziness of NaNoWriMo and am very focused on all those technical phrases?). Mr. Dryden is from the Arab Bureau and he is the one who suggests that Lawrence is the one to do the job concerning Prince Faisal, even though others werenʼt sure that he was the right person. After that he appears a few times throughout the film. He is the person who sends other people to do the work and just pulls the strings.

His character wasnʼt particularly likable to me, but the portrayal was so well done by Claude Rains! This was close to the end of his career. Every time that I watch a new movie with him I am astounded by the depth to his acting abilities. It is great to watch!


In fact, so many of the actors in here were so great! I do get that it is historical and that it is war and because of that there arenʼt many, er...ANY female roles, which I didnʼt notice until right now. Anyway, the actors who stood out to me were:

Alec Guinness: He is flat out amazing in everything, and this is no exception. Iʼm sorry, but he was my favorite part.
Omar Sherif: As soon as I saw him I thought, “Oh no! Itʼs Doctor Zhivago!” I actively loathe that movie, so thank you for reminding me. “While youʼre at it, why donʼt you give me a nice paper cut and pour lemon juice on it?” (Sorry, I couldnʼt help myself...). But, I was really shocked by how strong his acting was. From the beginning I disliked him, but he just continued to grow on me and ended up being my second favorite from Alec Guinness. Did you know that Omar Sherif spoke six languages? That is incredible! Here I am struggling with two...


Peter OʼToole: Yes, I will admit that the way he played Lawrence was really moving. Sometimes it moved me in weird directions that I had no idea was coming. This was one of his first roles and I was glad to see it because I like some of his later ones. 
Arthur Kennedy: This was the most different role that Iʼve ever seen from him. Iʼm so used to seeing him as the “baddie” in westerns, that I wasnʼt prepared to have him play a newspaper reporter. He did a great job!


Whew, with that Iʼm going to start wrapping this up! I guess that the longer the film the longer my post about it. Thanks to the Brannans for hosting! Check out the other blogathon entries HERE.

Now tell me, what is the longest movie that youʼve ever watched? Do you ever get burned out on a certain genre? Thank you so much for reading!

MovieCritic

Saturday, November 7, 2020

Movie Review: Silk Stockings (1957)

Bonjour!

Ah, musicals! They are so much fun, right? Sometimes you watch one and it changes your life...and sometimes to get one that at best makes you feel, “eh”. Today I'll be talking about, sadly, one of the later. But, I have a lot of fun roasting planned in this review which I know I will have a blast writing, and I hope you enjoy reading it!

My guarantee: On ALL of my reviews there are NO spoilers unless I give you warning. This is spoiler free, so wipe those worries away!


Silk Stockings (1957):
Based on: Ninotchka - by Melchoir Lengyel. This is a musical remake of the 1939 film. 
Russian citizen Vassili Markovitch is going to write the score for a movie in Paris. The Russian government doesnʼt like that and sends three men to take him back. They botch the job and the government is forced to send in one of their top agents, Ninotchka Yoschenko.  She is no nonsense. Things become complicated when the producer of the movie, Steve Canfield, finds himself attracted to her. Will the movie be made and will their lives all go back to normal?
Genres
: Musical, Romance, Drama.
Length: approx. 117 minutes.
Script: 9, no bad words. I'm taking down just a slight bit for a pet peeve of mine, which is when people don't use adverbs. In here a character said, "Live simple and die natural." and I nearly pulled my hair out.
'"You 'go, go, go', but you don't get anywhere."
"You're telling me!"
Crew: Directed by: Rouben Mamoulian. Written by: Melchoir Lengyel, Leonard Gershe, Leonard Spigelgass, George S. Kaufman, Leueen McGrath, & Abe Burrows.
Starring:
Fred Astaire as Steve Canfield.
Cyd Charisse as Ninotchka Yoschenko.
Jules Munshin as Bibinski.
Peter Lorre as Brankov.
Joseph Buloff as Ivanov.
George Tobias as Vassili Markovitch.
Janis Paige as Peggy Dayton.
Wim Sonneveld as Peter Ilyitch Boroff.
Costumes: 5, this is due to the fact that we had two whole scenes where people are dancing around in their underclothing. And making a point of it. There is actually a song all about it. It was just strange and weird and any other adjective that I can think of like that.
Costumes by: Helen Rose.
Cinematography: 7, I wasn't wowed, but musicals have lots of choreography, so that was fun.
Cinematography by:
Robert Bronner. An interesting thing is that all dances with Fred Astaire in it were choreographed by Hermes Pan, and all other dances were choreographed by Eugene Loring.
Music: 7, due to the song about underwear. But, I didn't mind a lot of the others. In fact, one song made me really happy.
Music by: Cole Porter and Conrad Salinger.
Notes: The character Peggy Dayton is obviously based on the actress Esther Williams, which was a tiny bit offensive to me because Peggy was very irritating and anytime I've seen Esther she was perfectly lovely. They reference her movie Neptune's Daughter (1949) which a fictional movie called "Neptune's Mother". In addition to that there are also lots of Russian stereotypes. There is also a reference to the play The Merchant of Venice.
Quotability: N/A, as I just watched it for the first time the other day.
Character 1: "Any questions?"
Character 2: "Uh--"
Character 1: "I will ask the questions!"
Content: 5, in addition to the costume thing (which you are probably tired of me mentioning it, but I got really tired of it, okay?), there is talk of suicide, smoking, drinking, very suggestive things, and talk of affairs between married and unmarried people.
Originality: 7, I've seen movies about making movies, and parts were pretty predictable. 
Good For: Fred Astaire fans.
Age Range:
I am completely undecided here. A lot of the content could probably go unnoticed by little kids, but maybe not. I was really bored while watching it (seriously, I kept stopping it to go do other things, and I never do that), but little kids might find it interesting with the dances? I don't know. I can't give an accurate figure here.
Overall Score: 6.5
"The arrangement of your features is not entirely repulsive to me."
Worth watching?: Yes, for one reason, but have patience, I will tell you what that was very soon.
Will I watch again?: Nope, I don't think I will. Once was enough for me.

For the blogathon:
(Did I have to look up the word Panache in the dictionary? The world will never know.)
When I heard about this blogathon I was so excited because those are two from the Golden Age of musicals! But, why did I pick this one? Story time! Looking through all of the posts that I have written, it turns out that I have reviewed quite a few musicals with either Fred Astaire or Gene Kelly. They are as follows:
Fred:
(Okay, there arenʼt as many as there seemed to be, but I promise you that more is coming soon!)
Gene:
Singinʼ in the Rain (1952) (Also known as my favorite movie of all time, no doubt about it)

And I have seen a few others, but my final choice came down to two: Review Follow the Fleet (1936) (One from Fred which I hated) or find something new. At the last moment, I had the opportunity to watch this and I jumped at it! I had never seen it before. It seemed fitting for this blogathon, because Fred Astaire retired from making musicals after this.


As you can tell with my review, I was not impressed. And to be honest, I was warned by THIS POST. Overall this just has that gritty quality of some late '50s movies. I have the feeling that it was made to show off how amazing Paris is, but it did the opposite for me. If that is all that Paris is, then I have no interest in going there. But, it wasn't a total waste of time, and there are somethings that I liked. In all due time, I'll get to it, but I'm going to do a wee bit of ranting first. With that I might start waltzing into SPOILER territory, so warning for that.

Firstly, the characters. Did I like the main character, Ninotchka?

*Picture this: a gif of Horst Kerr from Ratatouille (2007) saying, "Yeah, of course. Before he changed it."*

Ugh, how to start. When we first meet Ninotchka I was really impressed with her. She is direct and to the point, organized and tidy, and loyal and determined to help her country on whatever task she is given. Based on her credentials we know that she is very brave. She even has a good line: 
"It seems to me that seduction can only take place when one is willing."
In Paris we see her strength and stamina. "I prefer the stairs." (Up to the forth floor! I always take the stairs, too.)


She doesn't see why she should be treated any differently than the respect a man always gets. She says:
"Please don't make an issue of my womanhood."

What happens? The whole rest of the movie we make an issue of it. She meets Steve. Okay, there was absolutely no chemistry or attraction between them, but the filmmakers decided to try to make them a couple. Now don't get me wrong, I love Fred Astaire, but his character was very frustrating. Steve literally liked nothing about Ninotchka except how she looked. He was constantly trying to change who she was, just "so that she could be more like a woman". Apparently all of these good qualities that Ninotchka had, were 'too much like a man's'? Wow, really?

No characteristic is more masculine than feminine. Not even a combination of qualities immediately points to a certain gender. Every single person on in the world is different. If a woman is couragous it doesn't mean that she is trying to be manly. If a man has skill and precision it doesn't mean that he is girly. These are all shared traits!

Let me ask you, what exact does being a woman mean? The wonderful thing is that there is no right or wrong answer. But, according to this movie it is dressing up in fancy things and being pretty. Now, I am not bashing anyone who likes to do that. It is a perfectly good thing to do! I just ask that people don't critize anyone who isn't interested in that.


At the beginning of the movie we see the downfall and temptation of some men, so I understand how they were trying to even it out, which is fair. I get that it is about a character starting to live life and appreciate it, which I am all for.
"For the first time in my life I looked at something and thought, 'how beautiful' instead of 'how useful'."
But, you don't just flip the switch on people that quickly. People are complicated and detailed. It just could've been better. How? 

BACKSTORY.

Nothing with Ninotchka's character made sense (after a certain point), but if we could've had some more about her past it might have been clearer. Maybe she was a ballerina, but was rejected which is why she doesn't like to dance anymore. Maybe she grew up in a very poor place and always wanted special things but the one time she got something it was ruined immediately and therefore started looking at the practical side of things. Maybe she knew someone who died who wasn't prepared for life and she vowed to make sure that she was always ready and not waste time one what didn't matter.

There are a million possibilities here!

Even with the boatload of complaints, I feel like I finally got to see Cyd Charisse act for the first time. Usually she is just a girl for Gene Kelly or Fred Astaire to dance around (yes, I still feel that way about Brigadoon), but in here she was given a character. Sure, a character that was manipulated by the filmmakers, but we have to take the wins where we can.


Okay, now I'm going to get into what I did like about it and why it was worth watching!

Right out of the shoot I have to mention Fred. His dancing is amazing and top notch, as per usual. I remember the day that my sister asked my mom about tap dancing and she told us about Fred for the first time. She showed us two clips, and I immediately loved his dancing! One was with a lady where they danced on roller blades (when I finally watched Shall We Dance? (1937) I got so excited because I'd finally found where it came from!). The second is one that I listen to all the time and really like, but I had no idea what it was from.

Imagine my utter joy when I was watching along without caring and BOOM there it is. One of the final song and dance numbers in this movie was it! It was the one! I was so happy! So worth the whole movie for that.

Another highlight that I want to mention are Jules Munshin and Peter Lorre. I was not expecting to see them and it was a great treat. Peter Lorre's little dance that he tried to do anytime anyone else was dancing around cracked me up. It was hilarious!



Alright...I think I'm done now. Tell me, have any of you seen this? If so I would love to hear your thoughts! What do you like about it?

Thanks to Heidi for hosting this! Make sure to check out the other posts HERE. What do you think, readers? Have you ever watched a movie that you highly disliked, but one thing saved it? Have you ever watched a movie and found, "Oh, that song is from here!"? Thanks for reading!

MovieCritic
"If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, where you stop your story." -Orson Welles